Table 3. Subjective priority of traceable information preferred by consumers in the case of vegetables.
Rank | Object names | Best | Worst | Best-worst score | Standard score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 pesticide/veterinary use | 279 | 23 | 256 | 0.5020 |
2 | 1 picking/slaughtering date | 230 | 19 | 211 | 0.4137 |
3 | 3 fertilizer/feed use | 171 | 21 | 150 | 0.2941 |
4 | 9 environmental information of the origin | 176 | 37 | 139 | 0.2725 |
5 | 11 traceable tag certification information | 79 | 65 | 14 | 0.0275 |
6 | 4 history of illness and taking protective measures | 39 | 51 | -12 | -0.0235 |
7 | 5 processing information | 47 | 96 | -49 | -0.0961 |
8 | 10 producers’ information | 40 | 184 | -144 | -0.2824 |
9 | 6 packaging information | 30 | 188 | -158 | -0.3098 |
10 | 7 transportation information | 17 | 208 | -191 | -0.3745 |
11 | 8 retail information | 14 | 230 | -216 | -0.4235 |
Sum | 1122 | 1122 | 0 | 0 |
Frequency counts and Standardized Score (n = 102).