Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 2;13(11):e0206919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206919

Table 3. The effect of behavioral intervention regarding SLT and BQ use perceptions: Pre and post observation using GEE.

CONTROL INTERVENTION β (95% CI) p-value
Characteristic Behaviors
Mean (95% CI) Mean (95% CI)
Knowledge score
Pre 5.23 (5.15,5.30) 5.14 (5.06,5.21) (a) Ref.
Post 5.70 (5.65,5.74) 5.79 (5.75,5.82) 0.476 (0.410,0.543) <0.001
Interaction (TimexCondition)
InterventionxPost 0.176 (0.078,0.274) <0.001
Cohen's d (95% CI) 0.46 (0.37,0.56) 0.63 (0.55,0.72)
Perception scores regarding use
Pre 2.45 (2.40,2.49) 2.51 (2.47,2.54) (b) Ref.
Post 2.57 (2.53,2.60) 2.78 (2.75,2.80) 0.132 (0.096,0.168) <0.001
Interaction (TimexCondition)
InterventionxPost 0.141 (0.090,0.192) <0.001
Cohen's d (95% CI) 0.19 (0.10,0.28) 0.47 (0.39,0.56)
Perception scores regarding quitting
Pre 3.67 (3.62,3.71) 3.65 (3.60,3.69) (c) Ref.
Post 3.81 (3.77,3.84) 3.87 (3.84,3.89) 0.143 (0.102,0.185) <0.001
Interaction (TimexCondition)
InterventionxPost 0.067 (0.006,0.129) 0.031
  Cohen's d (95% CI) 0.21 (0.12,0.30) 0.33 (0.24,0.41)    

SLT: smokeless tobacco, BQ: betel quid.

GEE: generalized estimating equation, β: Beta coefficient, CI: confidence intervals.

(a): Adjusted model for knowledge score regarding the ill effects of SLT and/or BQ with the following variables: age, gender, school type and weekly pocket money.

(b): Adjusted model for perception score regarding SLT and/or BQ use with the following variables: age, gender, school type and weekly pocket money.

(c): Adjusted model for perception score regarding quitting the use of SLT and/or BQ with the following variables: age, gender, school type and weekly pocket money.

Interventionxpost–after 12 weeks in intervention group.

Timexcondition—time–post 12 week of intervention and condition–intervention group.