Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug 6;195:154–160. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.07.045

Table 3.

Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis of clinicopathologic and molecular prognostic variables in 240 patients with uveal melanoma

Clinical variables incorporated into TNM stage
Covariate Regression Coefficient, β (SE) Wald Statistic P-value Hazard Coefficient, Exp(b) (95% CI)
Gene expression profile 1.5594 (0.3329) 21.95 2.8 × 10−6 4.7559 (2.4768 to 9.1319)
PRAME status 10061(0.2732) 13.56 2.3 ×10−4 2.7349 (1.6009 to 4.6720)
TNM stage 0.4136 (0.1221) 11.47 7.1 × 10−4 1.5122 (1.1903 to 1.9213)
Male gendera
Clinical variables analyzed separately
Covariate Regression Coefficient, β (SE) Wald Statistic P-value Hazard Coefficient, Exp(b) (95% CI)
Gene expression profile 1.6787 (0.3276) 26.26 3.0 × 10−7 5.3484 (2.8195 to 10.1833)
Largest basal diameter 0.1340 (0.0391) 11.76 6.0 × 10−4 1.1434 (1.0591 to 1.2344)
PRAME status 0.7989 (0.2784) 8.23 0.0041 2.2230 (1.2881 to 3.8364)
Tumor thicknessa
Ciliary body involvementa
Male gendera
a

Excluded by the Cox multivariate model due to lack of significant independent prognostic value

Abbreviations: SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; PRAME, preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma; TNM, Tumor-Node-Metastasis