. 2018 Sep 26;8(10):760. doi: 10.3390/nano8100760

Table 1.

Comparison of the electrochemical performance of Ni₃S₂@C/RGO with several reported Ni₃S₂-based materials.

Electrode Material	Published Year	Maximum Reversible Capacity (Current Density)	Cycle Number	References
Ni₃S₂@N-G	2014	809 mAh·g⁻¹ (0.05 A·g⁻¹) 490 mAh·g⁻¹ (4.00 A·g⁻¹)	150	[7]
Ni₃S₂@N-G	2014	809 mAh·g⁻¹ (0.05 A·g⁻¹) 490 mAh·g⁻¹ (4.00 A·g⁻¹)		[7]
Ni₃S₂ Nano flakes	2015	861 mAh·g⁻¹ (0.40 A·g⁻¹) 514 mAh·g⁻¹ (4.00 A·g⁻¹)	70	[1]
Ni₃S₂ Nano flakes	2015	861 mAh·g⁻¹ (0.40 A·g⁻¹) 514 mAh·g⁻¹ (4.00 A·g⁻¹)		[1]
3D Ni₃S₂	2016	622 mAh·g⁻¹ (0.15 A·g⁻¹) 325 mAh·g⁻¹ (1.20 A·g⁻¹)	55	[39]
3D Ni₃S₂	2016	622 mAh·g⁻¹ (0.15 A·g⁻¹) 325 mAh·g⁻¹ (1.20 A·g⁻¹)		[39]
Ni₃S₂@C-RGO Slices	2016	520 mAh·g⁻¹ (0.20 A·g⁻¹) 410 mAh·g⁻¹ (1.00 A·g⁻¹)		[40]
Ni₃S₂@C/RGO	-	820 mAh·g⁻¹ (0.20 A·g⁻¹) 640 mAh·g⁻¹ (5.00 A·g⁻¹)	100	This work
Ni₃S₂@C/RGO	-	820 mAh·g⁻¹ (0.20 A·g⁻¹) 640 mAh·g⁻¹ (5.00 A·g⁻¹)		This work