Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 15;10(10):415. doi: 10.3390/toxins10100415

Table 5.

Comparison of the limit of detection (LOD) of microarray immunoassay and various other methods for mycotoxin detection.

Method Target Analyte LOD (ng/mL) Ref.
Fluorescent sensor AFB1 14 [27]
Aptamer-based fluorescent assay AFB1 1.6 [28]
FRET based fluorescence OTA 3.5 [29]
Lateral flow strip based aptasensor OTA 0.40 [30]
Novel biosensor platform OTA 2.57 [31]
ic-ELISA ZEN 0.114 [32]
Aptamer-based fluorescence assay ZEN 0.5 [34]
Microarray-Based Immunoassay FB1 11.1 [35]
Ic-ELISA FB1 1.15 [36]
Cell fluorescence biosensor ZEN and DON ZEN: 3.2 [33]
Lateral Flow Dual Immunoassay ZEN and FB1 ZEN: 0.35, FB1: 5.23 [38]
Multicolor ICGA AFB1, ZEN, and T-2 AFB1: 0.5, ZEN: 2 [37]
Suspension Array AFB1, ZEN, DON, and FB1 AFB1: 0.56, ZEN: 0.51, FB1: 6.0 [14]
Microarray immunoassay AFB1, OTA, ZEN, and FB1 AFB1: 0.21, OTA: 0.19, ZEN: 0.09, FB1: 0.24 This work