Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec;183:677–697. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.056

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

The ISC – bGLM relation. The top row depicts the ROIs corresponding to (from left to right) ISC, bGLM (I–S) and bGLM (S–I). The middle row the parameter estimates (β weights) from the ISC (x-axis) and bGLM (y-axis) as a function of the Intact/Scrambled state of the movie for the ROIs shown above. Significant differences between intact and scrambled in the dimension that was not used to define the ROI is shown by solid lines, non-significant differences, by dotted lines. The bottom row shows the overlap between ISC(I-S) with bGLM (I–S) and ISC(I-S) with bGLM (S–I). The numbers correspond to the ROI and the subscript I/G indicates membership to ISC/bGLM, so that 4I2G indicates an overlap between ROI 4 of the ISC and ROI 2 of the GLM.