Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec;183:757–768. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.053

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Panel A: Connectivity patterns for exemplar subjects. For extrinsic connections (i.e., between regions), red lines denote positive connectivity and blue lines negative connectivity. For self-connections, red lines depict connectivity above the prior mean, while blue lines depict connectivity below the prior mean (i.e., −0.5 Hz). Line thickness and brightness reflect the strength of the respective connection. Across datasets, subjects showed most dominant influence from either left (e.g., S2 and S3) or right IPC (e.g., S16 and S17). Moreover, self-inhibition was lowest for the dominant IPC in 15 subjects. Panel B: Loadings on the first principal component of effective connectivity across subjects. Coefficients of the left and right IPC show opposite signs. Self-connections (shown on diagonal in negative log-scale) have opposite loadings compared to ipsilateral extrinsic (off-diagonal) connections, which indicates that subjects with high extrinsic influence show high self-inhibition of the ipsilateral IPC.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure