Table 2.
Stability of asymmetry in effective connectivity within the DMN. The second column reports the number of sessions (and percentage) that showed significant asymmetry (i.e., irrespective of hemisphere) for each subject. The third column depicts the proportion of asymmetric sessions that showed the same dominance as the respective subject. Effect sizes of at least 70% are shown in bold. The fourth column shows the p-values for the proportion of asymmetric sessions for each subject, not corrected for multiple comparisons. The final column shows the p-values after correction for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini-Hochberg method (FDR = 5%). FDR-corrected p-values lower than 0.05 are shown in bold.
| Subject | Number Asym. Sessions (%) | Effect size (%) | Unc p-value | FDR-cor p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 74 (99%) | 71.6 | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| S2 | 135 (89%) | 74.8 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| S3 | 48 (98%) | 87.5 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| S4 | 12 (100%) | 66.6 | 0.388 | 0.443 |
| S5 | 46 (96%) | 60.9 | 0.184 | 0.268 |
| S6 | 8 (89%) | 87.5 | 0.070 | 0.113 |
| S7 | 41 (91%) | 75.6 | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| S8 | 43 (93%) | 88.4 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| S9 | 40 (93%) | 77.5 | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| S10 | 42 (98%) | 95.2 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| S11 | 10 (100%) | 90.0 | 0.021 | 0.038 |
| S12 | 10 (100%) | 90.0 | 0.021 | 0.038 |
| S14 | 10 (100%) | 40.0 | 0.754 | 0.754 |
| S16 | 8 (100%) | 75.0 | 0.289 | 0.385 |
| S17 | 10 (100%) | 70.0 | 0.344 | 0.423 |
| S20 | 8 (89%) | 62.5 | 0.727 | 0.754 |