Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain. 2018 Jun 8;19(11):1342–1351. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2018.05.009

Table 4: Results of the mediation analyses.

Path coefficients, standard error, confidence intervals for each path of the model. Effect size is presented for the indirect effects. Each of the paths are represented in Figure 1. Mediation can be assumed when the indirect effect is significant, represented by CI that do not cross zero.

Model Path coefficienta SE t Test statistic 95% CI
Lower Upper
Model 1: SLP-COG & Insomnia
Direct effect: Ethnicity -> SLP-COG (a1) .08 .33 .24 −.57 .73
Direct effect: Ethnicity -> insomnia (a2) −.55 .83 −.67 −2.18 1.08
Direct effect: SLP-COG ->Pain (b1) −.18 .09 −2.08* −.35 −.01
Direct effect: insomnia ->Pain (b2) .17 .03 5.69** .11 .23
Direct effect: SLP-COG ->insomnia (d21) 1.33 .21 6.41** .92 1.75
Direct effect: Ethnicity ->Pain (c’) −.92 .30 −3.07* −1.51 −.33
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->SLP-COG->Pain (a1b1) [−.01] .07 −.19 .12
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->Insomnia->Pain (a2b2) [−.09] .15 −.46 .20
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->SLP-COG->Insomnia ->Pain (a2 d21 b2) [.02] .09 −.16 .19
Model 2: PCS & Insomnia
Direct effect: Ethnicity -> PCS (a1) −4.78 1.82 −2.63** −8.37 −1.18
Direct effect: Ethnicity -> insomnia (a2) −.28 .94 −.30 −2.14 1.58
Direct effect: PCS ->Pain (b1) .06 .01 4.76** .04 .08
Direct effect: insomnia ->Pain (b2) .12 .02 5.01** .08 .17
Direct effect: PCS ->insomnia (d21) .05 .04 1.29 −.03 .13
Direct effect: Ethnicity ->Pain (c’) −.64 .28 −2.26* −1.21 −.08
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->PCS->Pain (a1b1) [−.28]* .14 −.65 −.05
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->Insomnia->Pain (a2b2) [−.03] .13 −.34 .18
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->PCS->Insomnia->Pain (a2 d21 b2) [−.03] .03 −.14 .01
Model 3: PCS-R & Insomnia
Direct effect: Ethnicity -> PCS-R (a1) −1.74 .74 −2.34* −3.21 −.27
Direct effect: Ethnicity -> insomnia (a2) −.41 .94 −.43 −2.26 1.45
Direct effect: PCS-R ->Pain (b1) .12 .03 3.75** .06 .18
Direct effect: insomnia ->Pain (b2) .13 .03 5.17** .08 .18
Direct effect: PCS-R ->insomnia (d21) .07 .10 .72 −.12 .27
Direct effect: Ethnicity ->Pain (c’) −.72 .29 −2.48* −1.29 −.15
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->PCS-R->Pain (a1b1) [−.21]* .10 −.45 −.05
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->Insomnia->Pain (a2b2) [−.03] .09 −.22 .11
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->PCS-R->Insomnia->Pain (a2 d21 b2) [−.01] .02 −.06 .01
Model 4: PCS-M & Insomnia
Direct effect: Ethnicity -> PCS-M (a1) −1.33 .59 −2.27* −2.49 −.17
Direct effect: Ethnicity -> insomnia (a2) −.55 .94 −.59 −2.41 1.31
Direct effect: PCS-M ->Pain (b1) .13 .04 3.14** .05 .21
Direct effect: insomnia ->Pain (b2) .14 .03 5.36** .09 .19
Direct effect: PCS-M ->insomnia (d21) −.01 .13 −.11 −27 .24
Direct effect: Ethnicity ->Pain (c’) −.75 .29 −2.56* −1.33 −.17
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->PCS-M->Pain (a1b1) [−.17*] .10 −.44 −.02
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->Insomnia->Pain (a2b2) [−.08] .14 −.37 .15
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->PCS-M->Insomnia ->Pain (a2 d21 b2) [.01] .03 −.06 .06
Model 5: PCS-H & Insomnia
Direct effect: Ethnicity -> PCS-H (a1) −1.70 .86 −1.97* −3.41 .01
Direct effect: Ethnicity -> insomnia (a2) −.21 .92 −.23 −2.04 1.61
Direct effect: PCS-H ->Pain (b1) .12 .03 4.46** .07 .17
Direct effect: insomnia ->Pain (b2) .12 .03 4.62** .07 .17
Direct effect: PCS-H ->insomnia (d21) .19 .08 2.20* .02 .36
Direct effect: Ethnicity ->Pain (c’) −.73 .28 −2.57* −1.29 −.17
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->PCS-H->Pain (a1b1) [−.21]* .13 −.53 −.01
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->Insomnia->Pain (a2b2) [−.03] .12 −.56 .12
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->PCS-H->Insomnia->Pain (a2 d21 b2) [−.04]* .03 −.14 −.01

SE – Standard error; CI – Confidence interval; IV – Independent variable; SLP-COG = Negative sleep cognitions; PCS – Pain Catastrophizing Scale

a

For the indirect effect this represents effect size in brackets [] and not a path coefficient

*

p < .05

**

p < .001.