Table 4: Results of the mediation analyses.
Model | Path coefficienta | SE | t Test statistic | 95% CI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower | Upper | ||||
Model 1: SLP-COG & Insomnia | |||||
Direct effect: Ethnicity -> SLP-COG (a1) | .08 | .33 | .24 | −.57 | .73 |
Direct effect: Ethnicity -> insomnia (a2) | −.55 | .83 | −.67 | −2.18 | 1.08 |
Direct effect: SLP-COG ->Pain (b1) | −.18 | .09 | −2.08* | −.35 | −.01 |
Direct effect: insomnia ->Pain (b2) | .17 | .03 | 5.69** | .11 | .23 |
Direct effect: SLP-COG ->insomnia (d21) | 1.33 | .21 | 6.41** | .92 | 1.75 |
Direct effect: Ethnicity ->Pain (c’) | −.92 | .30 | −3.07* | −1.51 | −.33 |
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->SLP-COG->Pain (a1b1) | [−.01] | .07 | −.19 | .12 | |
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->Insomnia->Pain (a2b2) | [−.09] | .15 | −.46 | .20 | |
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->SLP-COG->Insomnia ->Pain (a2 d21 b2) | [.02] | .09 | −.16 | .19 | |
Model 2: PCS & Insomnia | |||||
Direct effect: Ethnicity -> PCS (a1) | −4.78 | 1.82 | −2.63** | −8.37 | −1.18 |
Direct effect: Ethnicity -> insomnia (a2) | −.28 | .94 | −.30 | −2.14 | 1.58 |
Direct effect: PCS ->Pain (b1) | .06 | .01 | 4.76** | .04 | .08 |
Direct effect: insomnia ->Pain (b2) | .12 | .02 | 5.01** | .08 | .17 |
Direct effect: PCS ->insomnia (d21) | .05 | .04 | 1.29 | −.03 | .13 |
Direct effect: Ethnicity ->Pain (c’) | −.64 | .28 | −2.26* | −1.21 | −.08 |
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->PCS->Pain (a1b1) | [−.28]* | .14 | −.65 | −.05 | |
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->Insomnia->Pain (a2b2) | [−.03] | .13 | −.34 | .18 | |
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->PCS->Insomnia->Pain (a2 d21 b2) | [−.03] | .03 | −.14 | .01 | |
Model 3: PCS-R & Insomnia | |||||
Direct effect: Ethnicity -> PCS-R (a1) | −1.74 | .74 | −2.34* | −3.21 | −.27 |
Direct effect: Ethnicity -> insomnia (a2) | −.41 | .94 | −.43 | −2.26 | 1.45 |
Direct effect: PCS-R ->Pain (b1) | .12 | .03 | 3.75** | .06 | .18 |
Direct effect: insomnia ->Pain (b2) | .13 | .03 | 5.17** | .08 | .18 |
Direct effect: PCS-R ->insomnia (d21) | .07 | .10 | .72 | −.12 | .27 |
Direct effect: Ethnicity ->Pain (c’) | −.72 | .29 | −2.48* | −1.29 | −.15 |
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->PCS-R->Pain (a1b1) | [−.21]* | .10 | −.45 | −.05 | |
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->Insomnia->Pain (a2b2) | [−.03] | .09 | −.22 | .11 | |
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->PCS-R->Insomnia->Pain (a2 d21 b2) | [−.01] | .02 | −.06 | .01 | |
Model 4: PCS-M & Insomnia | |||||
Direct effect: Ethnicity -> PCS-M (a1) | −1.33 | .59 | −2.27* | −2.49 | −.17 |
Direct effect: Ethnicity -> insomnia (a2) | −.55 | .94 | −.59 | −2.41 | 1.31 |
Direct effect: PCS-M ->Pain (b1) | .13 | .04 | 3.14** | .05 | .21 |
Direct effect: insomnia ->Pain (b2) | .14 | .03 | 5.36** | .09 | .19 |
Direct effect: PCS-M ->insomnia (d21) | −.01 | .13 | −.11 | −27 | .24 |
Direct effect: Ethnicity ->Pain (c’) | −.75 | .29 | −2.56* | −1.33 | −.17 |
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->PCS-M->Pain (a1b1) | [−.17*] | .10 | −.44 | −.02 | |
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->Insomnia->Pain (a2b2) | [−.08] | .14 | −.37 | .15 | |
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->PCS-M->Insomnia ->Pain (a2 d21 b2) | [.01] | .03 | −.06 | .06 | |
Model 5: PCS-H & Insomnia | |||||
Direct effect: Ethnicity -> PCS-H (a1) | −1.70 | .86 | −1.97* | −3.41 | .01 |
Direct effect: Ethnicity -> insomnia (a2) | −.21 | .92 | −.23 | −2.04 | 1.61 |
Direct effect: PCS-H ->Pain (b1) | .12 | .03 | 4.46** | .07 | .17 |
Direct effect: insomnia ->Pain (b2) | .12 | .03 | 4.62** | .07 | .17 |
Direct effect: PCS-H ->insomnia (d21) | .19 | .08 | 2.20* | .02 | .36 |
Direct effect: Ethnicity ->Pain (c’) | −.73 | .28 | −2.57* | −1.29 | −.17 |
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->PCS-H->Pain (a1b1) | [−.21]* | .13 | −.53 | −.01 | |
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->Insomnia->Pain (a2b2) | [−.03] | .12 | −.56 | .12 | |
Indirect effect: Ethnicity->PCS-H->Insomnia->Pain (a2 d21 b2) | [−.04]* | .03 | −.14 | −.01 |
SE – Standard error; CI – Confidence interval; IV – Independent variable; SLP-COG = Negative sleep cognitions; PCS – Pain Catastrophizing Scale
For the indirect effect this represents effect size in brackets [] and not a path coefficient
p < .05
p < .001.