Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 29;9:1975. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01975

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) Perceived acceptance of the (imagined) separated peer as a function of peer maintenance norm (hign vs. low) and the (lack of) majority peer presence in class **p < 0.01. (B) Perceived acceptance of the (imagined) intergrated peer as a function of peer maintenance norm (hign vs. low) and the (lack of) majority peer presence in class *p < 0.05.