Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 22;109(11):3393–3402. doi: 10.1111/cas.13785

Table 3.

Relationship between milk fat globule‐epidermal growth factor factor 8 (MFG‐E8) expression and clinicopathological factors in 68 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)

Patient characteristics NAC+
MFG‐E8 Low MFG‐E8 High P‐value
N = 41 (%) N = 27 (%)
Age, years ≤65 25 (36.8) 18 (26.5) .630
>65 16 (23.5) 9 (13.2)
Sex Male 34 (50.0) 26 (38.2) .090
Female 7 (10.3) 1 (1.5)
Tumor location[Link] Ut 0 (0) 6 (8.8) .002
Mt‐Lt 41 (60.3) 21 (30.9)
Tumor differentiation[Link] Well‐Mod 32 (47.1) 18 (26.5) .300
Por 9 (13.2) 9 (13.2)
Tumor depth[Link] pT1‐2 12 (17.7) 7 (10.3) .760
pT3‐4 29 (42.7) 20 (29.4)
Lymph node metastasis[Link] pN0‐1 30 (44.1) 11 (16.2) .008
pN2‐3 11 (16.2) 16 (23.5)
Non‐regional lymph node metastasis[Link] pM0 34 (50.0) 16 (23.5) .030
pM1 7 (10.3) 11 (16.2)
Tumor stage[Link] pStageI‐II 15 (22.0) 6 (8.8) .210
pStageIII‐IV 26 (38.2) 21 (31.0)
Clinical response to NAC Responder 23 (33.8) 15 (22.0) .960
Non responder 18 (26.5) 12 (17.7)
Pathological response to NAC Responder 10 (14.7) 6 (8.8) .840
Non responder 31 (45.6) 21 (30.9)

Upper (Ut), middle (Mt), and lower (Lt) third of thorax.

Well, moderately (Mod), and poorly (Por) differentiated squamous cell carcinoma.

Pathological classification in UICC (7th edition).