Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 10;210(2):683–701. doi: 10.1534/genetics.118.301244

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effects of facultative but not very low rates of sex (i.e., σ1/N) on estimates of meiotic crossing over. (A) Decay of linkage disequilibrium over 900 sites, as a function of distance between two sites. Different colors denote individual rates of sex, as shown in the legend. Solid line is the mean value over 1000 simulations; fainter curves represent 95% confidence intervals. A total of 50 paired samples were simulated (100 samples in total), N=10,000, scaled mutation rate θ=4Nμ=10, scaled crossover rate during sex R=40. (B) As in (A) but instead shows results from obligate sex simulations ran using ms, using a crossover rate equal to 40σ as shown in the legend. Due to binning of samples, r2 is shown for distances between 25 and 875 sites apart in (A and B). (C) Estimates of R using LDhat, as a function of the effective crossover rate used in the facultative-sex coalescent simulation. Points are mean estimates from 1000 simulations, bars are 95% confidence intervals. Black line denotes y=x; dashed red line is the linear regression fit. (D) Plot of all simulation results in (A) but instead as a function of the rescaled recombination rate 4Ncσ (plotted on a natural log scale) and after omitting polymorphisms with minor allele frequency <10%. Dotted lines show analytical expectations (Equation 6). Note the different y-axis scale compared to (A).