Table 5. Summary of results for all the studied metals.
| Element | Deposit status | ACF ≤ 0 (no intervention) | 0 < ACF < 2 (conditional intervention) | ACF ≥ 2 (unconditional intervention) | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As | Active | 10 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
| Inactive | 18 | 0 | 4 | 22 | |
| Abandoned | 48 | 0 | 0 | 48 | |
| Cd | Active | 9 | 2 | 0 | 11 |
| Inactive | 10 | 12 | 0 | 22 | |
| Abandoned | 30 | 18 | 0 | 48 | |
| Pb | Active | 11 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| Inactive | 18 | 4 | 0 | 22 | |
| Abandoned | 48 | 0 | 0 | 48 | |
| Ni | Active | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Inactive | 0 | 22 | 0 | 22 | |
| Abandoned | 0 | 48 | 0 | 48 | |
| Hg | Active | 10 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
| Inactive | 20 | 2 | 0 | 22 | |
| Abandoned | 39 | 8 | 1 | 48 | |
| Cu | Active | 0 | 2 | 9 | 11 |
| Inactive | 0 | 6 | 16 | 22 | |
| Abandoned | 1 | 8 | 39 | 48 | |
| Zn | Active | 10 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
| Inactive | 18 | 4 | 0 | 22 | |
| Abandoned | 48 | 0 | 0 | 48 | |
| Cr | Active | 1 | 10 | 0 | 11 |
| Inactive | 6 | 10 | 6 | 22 | |
| Abandoned | 13 | 35 | 0 | 48 | |
| Total | 648 | ||||
Note:
This table presents the information regarding to the necessity of intervention results for the tailings according to the adjusted threshold factor for the different metals grouped by tailing deposit status (active, inactive, or abandoned).