Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 2;6:e5879. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5879

Table 9. Summary of results for the top 10 critical sites according to their WIR value.

ID Deposit Status As Cd Pb Ni Hg Cu Zn Cr WIR
190-TP-2 ARIZONA 1 INACTIVE 2.45 0.84 1.21 1.27 −1.73 2.02 1.26 1.39 19.88
190-TP ARIZONA 1 INACTIVE 2.45 0.59 1.21 1.27 −1.73 2.02 1.26 1.39 19.13
191-W-2 ARIZONA 2 INACTIVE 2.74 −0.27 1.68 1.19 −1.44 1.86 1.56 −0.36 15.84
191-W ARIZONA 2 INACTIVE 2.74 −0.57 1.68 1.19 −1.44 1.86 1.56 −0.36 14.93
152-TP SANTA TERESITA 2 ACTVE 1.58 1.19 −1.12 1.17 −1.78 2.97 −0.94 1.18 9.27
176-TP-2 ARENILLAS 2 INACTIVE −1.33 0.84 −1.67 1.23 1.73 2.97 −1.18 1.14 4.71
176-TP ARENILLAS 2 INACTIVE −1.33 0.75 −1.67 1.23 1.73 2.97 −1.18 1.14 4.45
197-W PUNTA CALETONES 3 ABANDONED −1.33 1.62 −1.62 1.16 1.82 2.61 −1.00 −0.22 4.30
209-TP IRENE 2 ABANDONED −1.33 1.19 −1.58 1.18 0.97 2.87 −0.97 0.69 3.57
189-W-2 ARIZONA 1 INACTIVE −1.33 −1.09 −1.54 1.21 2.12 2.99 −0.99 1.08 3.14

Note:

Each row represents a tailing sample, this table details the values of the adjusted threshold factor for each element and the value of the WIR, it also includes the information about the deposit from where the sample was extracted.