Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 19;3(10):13676–13684. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01903

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Charge–discharge cycles for (a) pure TiO2, (b) 3% Cu-doped TiO2, and (c) 7% Cu-doped TiO2. (d) Comparative charge–discharge curves of the second cycle for all nanopowder materials in the potential range of 0.01–3 V vs Li/Li+ for an applied scan rate of 0.05 A g–1.