Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Med. 2017 Oct 25;48(9):1494–1503. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717002999

Table 3:

Comparisons of models to assess measurement invariance of the unidimensional DQ, SUD, and EXT models.

#
Parameters
BIC Difference CFI Difference

Delinquency Model
 Unconstrained (ref) 144 1,660,689 ----- 0.954 -----
 Constrain a, b 34 1,660,051 −638 0.965 0.011
  Constrain a, b, σ2 23 1,659,969 −720 0.973 0.019
  Constrain a, b, 23 1,660,397 −292 0.952 −0.002
 Constrain a, b, x̅, σ2 12 1,661,023 +334 0.961 0.007
SUD Model
 Unconstrained (ref) 144 1,268,727 ----- 0.985 -----
 Constrain a, b 34 1,268,001 −726 0.984 −0.001
 Constrain a, b, σ2 23 1,267,905 −822 0.987 0.002
 Constrain a, b, 23 1,268,126 −601 0.970 −0.015
  Constrain a, b, x̅, σ2 12 1,268,529 −198 0.974 −0.011
Externalizing Model
 Unconstrained (ref) 288 1,874,060 ------- 0.916 -------
 Constrain a, b 46 1,872,550 −1,510 0.938 0.022
  Constrain a, b, σ2 35 1,872,456 −1,604 0.946 0.030
 Constrain a, b, 35 1,873,226 −834 0.929 0.013
 Constrain a, b, x̅, σ2 24 1,873,745 −315 0.939 0.023

Notes: a=Item discrimination coefficient, b=threshold, x̅=latent factor mean, σ2=latent factor variance.