Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur Econ Rev. 2018 Jun 30;109:9–22. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.06.009

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

Positively Impacted Outcomes, ABC/CARE Males and Females

Note: Panel (a) displays the percentage of positive treatment effects in accordance with the parameter in Equation (3)—treatment vs. staying at home—by gender. Panel (b) is analogous for Equation (4)—treatment vs. alternative formal childcare. Standard errors are based on the empirical bootstrap distribution. The null hypothesis is that the proportions of positive treatment effects are greater than 50%. For a full list of the estimated combining functions, see Appendix D.