Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 30;1(1):3–13. doi: 10.3233/BLC-150010

Table 1.

Design rules for neoadjuvant bladder cancer trials

Specifics Impact of failure to observe rules
Rule 1 Incorporate complex biology Failure of single agent chemotherapy in randomized neoadjuvant trials
Rule 2 Avoid variable constants Impact of suboptimal surgery:
worse survival curves for control groups
possible impact in adjuvant trials – e.g. No disease
Rule 3 Repetition doesn’t make it right Serial reports and overviews of RTOG studies:
dilutes impact of long-term follow-up in survival curves
large numbers still do not prove superiority
Rule 4 Randomization trumps historical controls Phase II single agent neoadjuvant trials suggested possible survival benefit **
Rule 5 If it doesn’t make sense, it’s probably wrong Use of disease-free interval as primary parameter for adjuvant trials
Misinterpretation of meta-analyses of adjuvant therapy – inclusion of inappropriate sets of data
Failure to implement level 1 clinical trials data in treatment of invasive disease

 **By comparison, phase III trials proved clinical and statistical benefit of neoadjuvant MULTI-AGENT chemotherapy.