Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 9;7:e38281. doi: 10.7554/eLife.38281

Figure 2. Evaluation of the range of rod signaling in phototransduction and in the retinal output.

Figure 2.

(A) Direct recordings of photocurrent from rod outer segments (primate). Comparison of the responses to a short-wavelength saturating flash and a family of 10 s light steps or ‘backgrounds.’ (B) Current suppression, relative to saturation, plotted as a function of background luminance. Red arrow (250 R*/rod/s) indicates 90% saturation. (C) Gain of rod signals probed with short wavelength flashes on a range of rod adapting backgrounds in rod photoreceptors (top), On parasol RGCs (middle) and On Midget RGCs (bottom; traces are mean responses scaled by the flash strength in R*/rod, see Materials and methods). Gain is normalized to that measured at 0.3 R*/rod/s. (D) Population data for rod gain measurements in rod photoreceptors and ganglion cells. The solid line shows Weber behavior, and the dashed line highlights the steep drop in gain associated with rod saturation. Gain is normalized to that measured at 0.3 R*/rod/s.

Figure 2—source data 1. Excel spreadsheet with data for Figure 2B and D.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38281.004
Figure 2—source data 2. Matlab .mat file with data traces from Figure 2A.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38281.005
Figure 2—source data 3. Matlab .mat file with data traces from Figure 2C.
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38281.006