Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 2;4(10):e00885. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00885

Table 7.

Comparative Fermentation Efficiency (%) and ethanol productivity (ml/kg dry biomass) from steam and DSA pretreated biomass under F-SHF and F-SSF.

Biomass Steam pretreated
DSA pretreated
F-SHF F-SSF F-SHF F-SSF
(a) Fermentation efficiency (%)
SP peel 73.44b 69.53d 82.69a 71.03c
EFY peel 72.49d 75.55c 96.99a 79.05b
Tannia peel 71.58c 72.01c 90.64a 73.52b
GY peel 74.39b 69.62d 94.26a 73.30c
BR peel 75.04b 64.59d 93.69a 66.63c
(b) Ethanol productivity (ml/kg dry biomass)
SP peel 232.36d (221.01) 289.67a (276.98) 283.09b (272.50) 281.38c (271.02)
EFY peel 231.30d (217.98) 302.11a (290.23) 282.03c (273.48) 294.14b (280.94)
Tannia peel 223.01c (212.66) 280.97a (267.32) 273.66b (263.38) 272.68b (261.81)
GY peel 268.13d (256.20) 311.62b (301.97) 318.86a (306.67) 303.33c (292.56)
BR peel 295.28d (281.66) 318.21b (307.21) 346.01a (335.48) 310.24c (298.22)

Figures in parentheses indicate the recovery through distillation (mean from two replicates); Other values are mean from three replicates; means with different superscripts in each row are significant at p < 0.05.