Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 30;9:2543. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02543

Table 2.

Relative abundances of bacterial genera determined by Illumina sequencing of 16S amplicns or by isolation on selective media; the comparison was performed at the end of the enrichment (step III).

Bacterial genus 16S Illumina
Bacterial isolates
S1 S2 S3 S1 S2 S3
Acholeplasma nd nd nd nd nd 4,3
Achromobacter 26.68 29.37 8.39 7.7 4.4 4.3
Acinetobacter 0.38 0.18 1.60 nd nd 4.3
Agrobacterium 9.08 11.79 11.62 nd nd nd
Ancylobacter 0.30 2.53 0.40 nd nd nd
Azospirillum 4.17 2.50 0.24 nd nd nd
Bacillus 0.11 0.09 0.09 7.7 8.9 nd
Cellulosimicrobium 0.03 0.02 0.08 nd nd 4.3
Cupriavidus 4.64 0.46 0.08 nd 2.2 nd
Gordonia 3.00 0.04 0.06 3.8 nd nd
Helicobacter nd nd nd nd 2.2 nd
Klebsiella 0.08 2.63 0.08 nd nd nd
Ochrobactrum 2.89 0.67 0.32 3.8 nd nd
Olivibacter 1.13 6.57 1.28 nd nd nd
Paenibacillus 0.02 0.24 0.05 nd 2.2 nd
Pseudomonas 24.21 25.25 63.49 57.7 48.9 69.6
Pseudoxanthomonas 2.95 2.62 0.66 8.7 4.4 nd
Rhizobium nd nd nd nd nd 4.3
Serratia 0.00 0.24 0.01 nd 6.7 nd
Shinella 2.79 0.25 0.03 nd nd nd
Sphingobacterium 0.95 0.94 1.60 3.8 17.8 nd
Stenotrophomonas 1.23 0.77 1.42 7.7 2.2 8.7

Data are expressed as percentages (among 10,065 sequences for Illumina data, among 96 strains for isolates).