Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 2;4(10):e00884. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00884

Table 5.

Sinus augmentation with primary outcome measure related to new bone formation (mean ± SD, 95% CI, and P value).

Studies Intervention group N Measurement methods Follow-up (month) Control group (C) Test group (T) Power of statistic
Schmitt CM et al., 2013 (RCT) T: Biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) with 60% HA 14 Histomorphometric (newly formed bone) 5 C1: 24.90 ± 5.67%
C2: 35.41 ± 2.78%
C3: 41.74 ± 2.10%
T: 30.28 ± 2.16% P = 0.000 between T & C3
C: Inorganic bovine bone (ABB) 15
C2: Bone allograft (MCBA) 12
C3: Autologous bone (AB) 12
Ghanaati S et al., 2013 (RCT) T: Synthetic HA (NanoBone) 4 Histomorphometric (newly formed bone) 6 C: 25.73 ± 7.94% T: 21.85 ± 5.96% P > 0.05 (Pval < 0.05)
C: Deproteinized bovine bone (Bio-Oss) 4
Lezzi G et al., 2012 (CCT) T1: Phycogene HA (Algipore) 6 Histomorphometric (newly formed bone) 6 C1: 31.8 ± 2.9%
C2: 32.9 ± 0.5%
T1: 33.2 ± 1.2%
T2: 30.5 ± 3.4%
T3: 28.1 ± 3.9%
P < 0.05 (Pval < 0.05)
T2: Macroporous biphasic CaPO4 (MBCP) 6
T3: Calcium carbonate (Biocoral) 6
C1: Collagenized porcine cortical/cancellous bone (Apatos) 6
C2: Inorganic bovine bone (ABB) 6
Kurkcu M et al., 2012 (CCT) T: β-Tri calcium phosphate or β-TCP (Kasios) 13 Histomorphometric (newly formed bone) 6.5 30.13 ± 3.45% 21.09 ± 2.86% P = 0.001 (Pval < 0.05)
C: Inorganic bovine derivate HA (Bone Plus-XS) 13
Lorenz J. et al., 2014 (CCT) T: Synthetic HA (NanoBone) 7 Histomorphometric (nexwly formed bone) 7 22.66 ± 7.97% 19.02 ± 7.28% P > 0.05 (Pval < 0.05)
C: Deproteinized bovine bone (Bio-Oss) 7
Lindrgen C et al., 2012 (RCT) T: Biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) 5 Histomorphometric (newly formed bone) 8 31.7 ± 18.0% 28.6 ± 14.3% P = 0.67 (Pval < 0.05)
C: Deproteinized bovine bone (DBB) 5
Boeck-Neto RJ et al., 2001 (CCT) T: Autogenous + HA 5 Histomorphometric (newly formed bone) 10 50.46 ± 16.29% 46.79 ± 8.56% NA
C: Autogenous + DFDBA 5
Mangano C et al., 2007 (CCT) T: Porous synthetic HA 20 Histomorphometric (newly formed bone) 12 36.2 ± 1.4% 34.7 ± 3.1% P = 0.031 (Pval < 0.05)
C: Bovine derivate HA 20
Artzi Z et al., 2001 (RCT) T: Synthetic nonceramic resorbable HA (NC-HA) 14 Histomorphometric (bone area fraction at 10 sites) 12 42.1 ± 10.0% 32.2 ± 8.15% NA
C: Natural deproteinized bovine HA (BHA) 14
Baena RR et al., 2013 (RCT) T: Polyacid-HA (PLGA/HA) 4 Radiographic by CT (bone density) 6 946 ± 161.9 286 ± 134.4 P = 0.002 (Pval < .05)
C: Deproteinized bovine bone 4
Tosta M et al., 2013 (RCT) T: Biphasic calcium phosphate (with 60% HA and 40% β-TCP) + Membrane collagen
C: Particulate autogenous + Membrane collagen
15
15
Histomorphometric (area fraction of mineralized bone) 9 Area 1:
41.03 ± 4.62%
Area 2:
38.63 ± 7.52%
Area 1:
33.70 ± 8.08%
Area 2:
26.68 ± 3.92%
P1 = 0.008
P2 < 0.001 (Pval < 0.05)
Lindgren C et al., 2010 (CCT) T: β-TCP + HA 11 Histological analysis
EDS (Ca/P Ratio)
8 1.72 ± 0.07 1.63 ± 0.02 NA
C: Deproteinized Bovine Bone 11
Karabuda C et al., 2001 (CCT) T: Porous HA (PHA) 3 Histomorphometric (newly formed bone) 6 C1: 70–75%
C2: 50%
20–35% NA
C1: Demineralized freeze-dried bone powder (DFBP) 1
C2: Deproteinized bovine bone granule (DBBG) 5
Lorenzetti M et al., 1998 (CCT) T: Autogenous from chin + PHA (Interpore 200) 3 Histomorphometric (newly formed bone) 8&12 C1: 53%
C2: 69.3%
C3: 62.6%
T: 44.3% NA
C1: Autogenous from iliac 4
C2: Autogenous from chin 3
C3: Particulate autogenous 3
Kuhl S et al., 2012 (CCT) T: Blood + PAB + β-TCP 10 Radiographic by CT (bone density) NA #C: 0.5 #T1: 0.08
#T2: 0.00031
P = 0.341 (Pval < 0.05)
T: Blood + PAB + β-TCP/HA 10
C: Blood + PAB 10
Kuhl S et al., 2013 (CCT) T1: Blood + Autogenous Bone (PAB) + β-TCP 10 Radiographic by μ-CT (Volume fraction bone) 5 18.5% T1: 17.1%
T2: 21.7%
P = 0.578
T2: Blood + PAB + β-TCP/HA 10
C: Blood + PAB 10