Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Nov 6.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Assess. 2016 Oct 31;29(9):1082–1095. doi: 10.1037/pas0000412

Table 6.

Tests of Measurement Invariance of the Emotions as a Child Scale Across Race/Ethnicity

Invariance test χ2(df) χ2/df CFI (ΔCFI) RMSEA (ΔRMSEA) SRMR (ΔSRMR) Δχ2df) P
Anger scaleb
 Configurai invariance 264.498 (106) 2.50 .942 (−) .076 (−) .065 (−)
 Full metric invariance 294.906 (116) 2.54 .934 (−.008) .077 (.001) .082 (.017) 30.41 (10) <.001
 Full scalar invariance 332.979 (126) 2.64 .924 (−.010) .079 (.002) .080 (−.002) 38.07 (10) <.001
 Partial scalar invariance 320.460 (125) 2.56 .928 (−.006) .077 (.000) .083 (.001) 25.55 (9) <.01
 Partial residual variance invariance 347.505 (131) 2.65 .921 (−.007) .079 (.002) .091 (.008) 27.05 (6) <.001
Fear scale
 Configural invariance 340.321 (106) 3.21 .920 (−) .092 (−) .071 (−)
 Full metric invariance 365.780 (116) 3.15 .915 (−.005) .091 (−.001) .085 (.014) 25.46 (10) <.01
 Full scalar invariance 408.737 (126) 3.24 .904 (−.011) .093 (.002) .081 (−.004) 42.96 (10) <.001
 Partial scalar invariance 390.034 (125) 3.12 .910 (−.005) .090 (−.001) .083 (−.002) 24.25 (9) <.01
 Partial residual variance invariance 414.238 (129) 3.21 .903 (−.007) .092 (.002) .095 (.012) 24.20 (4) <.001
Sadness scalea
 Configural invariance 374.817 (106) 3.54 .895 (−) .098 (−) .084 (−)
 Full metric invariance 413.076 (116) 3.56 .884 (−.011) .099 (.001) .103 (.019) 38.26 (10) <.001
 Partial metric invariance 400.057 (115) 3.48 .888 (−.007) .097 (−.001) .095 (.011) 25.24 (9) <.01
 Partial scalar invariance 418.421 (122) 3.43 .884 (−.004) .096 (−.001) .096 (.001) 18.36(7) <.05
 Partial residual variance invariance 435.702 (126) 3.46 .879 (−.005) .097 (.001) .101 (.005) 17.28 (4) <.01

Note. CFI = comparative fit index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis index; SRMR = standardized root mean square residual; RMSEA = root mean square error

a

Supportive responses with unsupportive responses were moderately correlated at different levels of measurement invariance

b

Supportive responses with unsupportive responses was negativelycorrelated at different levels of measurement invariance for European American group