Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 5;20:71. doi: 10.1186/s12968-018-0496-1

Table 2.

Comparison of fast left atrial strain (ε) and strain rate (SR) measurements among subject groups

Parameters Normal Controls (n = 50) HCM (n = 30) HFpEF (n = 30) HFmrEF (n = 30) HFrEF (n = 40)
Left atrial longitudinal strain
 Reservoir εs, % 35.3 ± 5.2 27.0 ± 4.8* 23.8 ± 4.5*# 18.8 ± 6.6*#$ 12.0 ± 5.8*#$^
 Conduit εe, % 18.1 ± 4.3 12.1 ± 4.3* 9.6 ± 3.2*# 8.6 ± 3.4*# 6.1 ± 3.1*#$^
 Booster εa, % 17.2 ± 3.5 14.9 ± 3.5* 14.2 ± 3.7* 10.2 ± 4.9*#$ 6.0 ± 3.8*#$^
Left atrial longitudinal strain rate
 Reservoir SRs, 1/s 1.8 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.3* 1.1 ± 0.2*# 0.9 ± 0.3*#$ 0.6 ± 0.2*#$^
 Conduit SRe, 1/s −2.0 ± 0.5 −1.1 ± 0.4* −0.9 ± 0.3*# −0.8 ± 0.3*# −0.6 ± 0.3*#$^
 Booster SRa, 1/s −2.3 ± 0.6 −1.8 ± 0.4* −1.7 ± 0.3* −1.2 ± 0.5*#$ − 0.7 ± 0.4*#$^

Data are represented as mean ± SD. HCM: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, HFpEF heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, HFmrEF heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction, HFrEF heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, *significant difference compared to controls, #significant difference compared to HCM, $significant difference compared to HFpEF, ^significant difference compared to HFmrEF