Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 6;8:16399. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34512-6

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Response gain as a function of the response standard deviation. Test of the different models for (A) azimuth, and (B) elevation response components, pooled for the SNR and low-pass experiments (data from 11 subjects; N = 32 per component; one subject excluded, see Methods). (A) Azimuth responses invariably have a high gain, regardless of the stimulus conditions, and are best described by a constant gain around 0.9 (MLE). (B) The elevation responses show a fundamentally different behaviour. The data in panel B were fitted with Eqn. 9 (MAP model, red line, for which the average prediction error is zero), Eqn. 10 (AS model, blue, with standard deviation of the optimal fit in shading), and Eqn. 11 (PM model, black, shading: standard deviation). Note that all three models have the same free parameter: σP. The PM and AS models both outperform the MAP decision strategy by far.