Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 6;28:42. doi: 10.1038/s41533-018-0108-4

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies and key implementation and health outcomes

Study, year, country, design, risk of bias, duration Setting, participants recruited Brief intervention description, control Key results
BOLD are significant results
* indicate the trial’s defined primary outcomes
Studies which evaluated the PACE programme
Bruzzese et al.17
2006
USA
2-group cluster RCT
Unclear RoB
2 yr
44 schools = clusters
PCPs: NR
591 low-income ethnic minority families (307 I, 284 C)
PACE initiative: develops skills for treating asthma, including supporting patients & families to self-manage
Incentives: CME credits and catered meals;
Invitation letter signed by Commissioner of Health
Control: Standard care
Implementation outcome: NR
Health outcome: Compared to control, at 2 yrs difference in patient reported (Mean/yr (SD):
• Urgent physician visits: I: 1.7 (3.0), C: 1.8 (3.6) p = NS
• ED visits: I: 0.9 (2.2), C: 0.9 (1.8) p = NS
• Hospitalisations: I: 0.2 (0.6), C: 0.1 (0.3) p < .05 (favours C)
Similar results at 1 yr
Cabana et al.18,19
2006
USA
2-group cluster RCT
Unclear RoB
2 yr
10 cities/ regions = clusters
PC paediatricians practice: 94 (51 I, 43 C)
Children/parents: 870 (418 I; 452 C)
PACE initiative: develops skills for treating asthma, including supporting patients & families to self-manage
Incentives: CME credits, certificate, honorarium
Control: Standard care (but received honorarium)
Implementation outcome: NR
Health outcome: Compared to control, at 1 yr difference in change in patient reported (Mean change):
• Urgent office visits: 1 yr: I: −1.07, C: −0.9, p = NS;
ED visits: I: −0.55, C: −0.30, p<.05 (sustained at 2yr, p<0.038)
• Hospitalisations: I: −0.06, C: −0.06, p = NS
Clark et al.16,20,21
1998
USA
2-group RCT
Unclear RoB
2 yr
74 practices
Paediatricians: 74 (38 I, 36 C)
Children/parents: 637 (336 I, 301 C)
PACE initiative: develops skills for treating asthma, including supporting patients & families to self-manage
Control: Standard care
Implementation outcome: Compared to control:
At 22m more parents had written plan I: 26%, C: 16%, OR 1.74, p=.03
At 5m more physicians gave written plan I: 4.30, C: 3.46, p=0.001;
Health outcome: Compared to control, at 2 yr there was (Mean):
• No difference in patient reported ED visits: I: 0.29, C: 0.47, p = 0.44
Fewer patient reported hospitalisations: I 0.03, C 0.10, p=0.03
Griffiths et al.25
2016
UK
2-group cluster RCT
Unclear RoB
1 yr
84 PCPs = clusters
Nurses & GPs: NR
South Asian adults/children: 375 (183 I, 192 C)
PACE initiative adapted for UK clinicians caring for South Asian patients: develops skills for treating asthma, including supporting patients & families to self-manage. Two lunchtime seminars
Control: Standard care
Implementation outcome: NR
Health outcome: Compared to control, at 1 yr no difference in:
* Unscheduled care: OR 0.71 (95% CI 0.43 to 1.20), p = .20
* Time to first unscheduled care: HR 1.19 (95% CI 0.92 to 1.53) p = 0.19
Compared to control, at 3 m there was greater improvement in
QoL (AQ20) mean diff −2.56 (95% CI −3.89 to −1.24), p<0.001
Shah et al.28
2011
Australia
2-group RCT
Unclear RoB
1 yr
109 PCPs
GPs: 150 (78 I, 72 C)
Children/parents: 221 (111 I, 110 C)
PACE initiative: adapted for Australian Cycle of Care develops skills for treating asthma, including supporting patients & families to self-manage
Control: Standard care
Implementation outcome: Compared to control, at 1 yr more:
Parents had a written action plan I: 61% C: 46% diff 15% (95% CI 2 to 28%) p=0.046
GPs provided written action plan>70% of the time I: 76% C: 53% diff 23% (95% CI 11 to 36%) p=0.002
Health outcome: Compared to control, at 1 yr there was no difference in:
• Hospitalization: I: 18% C: 12% diff 6% (95% CI −4 to 15%) p = 0.12
Studies which evaluated initiatives other than PACE
Cleland et al.22
2007
UK
2-group cluster RCT
Unclear RoB
6 months
13 PCPs = clusters (6 I, 7 C)
Nurses: NR
Adults: routine data: 629 373 I; 256 C
questionnaire: 236 (130 I, 106 C)
One interactive seminar on effective communication, self-management education, and use of action plans
Control: Standard care
Implementation outcome: NR
Health outcome: Compared to control, at 6 m there was no difference in:
• Steroid courses: I: 1.07 (1.04–1.10) C: 1.11 (1.07–1.45) p = 0.12
• Compared to control, at 6 m there was:
* Improved QoL (miniAQLQ) I: 6.49 (6.40–6.59) C: 6.33 (6.23–6.44) p=0.03
• No difference in asthma control (ACQ): I: 3.14 (3.06–3.23) C: 3.2 (3.10–3.30) p = 0.43
Cohen et al.23
2014
Israel
5-group CCT
High RoB
2 yrs
PCPs in 5 HMO divisions = ‘clusters’
GPs: 258 (45 I1, 35 I2, 21 I3, 36 I4, 121 C) Nurses: NR
Patients > 12 yr: 1056 (54 I1, 219 I2, 106 I3, 171 I4, 506 C)
Focused on effective communication, self-management education for patient/families, and use of action plans
I1: GPs: Patients with uncontrolled asthma identified & targeted
I2: GPs: I1 plus workshop
I3: GPs & nurses: I1 plus simulation training
I4: GPs & nurses: I1 plus I2 plus I3
Control: Standard care
Implementation outcome: NR
Health outcome: Change in rate of uncontrolled asthma (based on inhaler purchase data) 1yr-baseline I1: 0.15 I2: 0.14 I3: 0.20 I4: 0.28C: 0.003
Diff I1-C: 0.15 z-score 3.27 p<0.01
Diff I2-C: 0.13 z-score 5.67 p<0.01
Diff I3-C: 0.19 z-score 5.00 p<0.01
Diff I4-C: 0.26 z-score 7.97 p<0.01
Similar results at 2 yrs
Evans et al.24
1997
USA
2-group cluster RCT
Unclear RoB
2 yr
Clusters = 2 panels of PCPs (11 I, 11 C)
Professionals: 134 (80 I, 54 C)
Children/parents: 358
Creating a Medical Home for Asthma; Focused on effective communication, self-management education for patient/families, and use of action plans
Control Standard care (but received guidelines)
Implementation outcome: Compared to control, at 2 yr there was:
• no difference in the proportion of patients given written plan by physician: I: 78% C: 76% (p = NS) or nurse I: 60% C: 53% p = NS
increased proportion received education by physician I: 71% C: 58% p<0.01 but no difference by nurse I: 61% C: 44% p = NS
Health outcome: No difference in proportion who received oral steroid course I: 5% C: 1% p = NS
Difference in proportion who received
any β-agonist I: 74% C: 52% p<.05
any inhaled anti-inflammatory I: 25% C: 2% p<.001
Homer et al.26
2005
USA
2-group cluster RCT
High RoB
1 yr
43 practices = clusters (22 I, 21 C)
3-member team (physician, nurse, office staff): NR
Children/parents: 631 (294 I, 337 C)
Learning collaborative project: participants identified performance gaps in their own practices’ asthma care, and learning was based on these
Control: Standard care
Implementation outcome: Compared to control, at 1 yr there was no difference in:
* proportion of patients given written management plan: I: 54% C: 41% p = NS
Health outcome: Compared to control, at 1 yr there was no difference in:
• Hospitalisation: I: 2% C: 4% p = NS
• ED visit: I: 17% C: 22% p = NS
• Asthma attack: I: 40% C: 36% p = NS
Prabhakaran et al.27
2012
Singapore
3-group RCT
Unclear RoB
3 months
1 tertiary hospital
Enroled nurses: 162 (59 I1, 55 I2, 48 I3)
No patients recruited
Education on general management of asthma, specifically including self-management support
I1: Workshop with practical skills
I2: As I1 except lectures in e-learning format
I3: combination of I1 and I2
Control: Interventions compared, no standard care control
Implementation outcome: Knowledge (not assessed with validated tool)
Health outcomes: NR
Sheikh et al.29
2016
USA
2-group cluster RCT
Unclear RoB
2 yr
10 PC paediatric practices = clusters (5 I, 5 C)
Professionals: NR
Patients: routine data: NR
Education of Asthma Leaders in each practice on general management of asthma, specifically including self-management support
Control: delayed intervention
Implementation outcome: Compared to control, at 1 yr there was increased recording of:
Asthma education: I: 56.1%, C: 19.5%, p0.05
Asthma action plan: I: 29%, C: 5.4%, p0.05
Compared to control, at 1 yr there was no difference in:
• Acute care visit: I: 90.3%, C: 91.9%, NS
Smeele et al.30
1999
Netherlands
2-group cluster RCT
Unclear RoB
1 yr
PCPs in same ‘local group’ = cluster
GPs: 34 practice assistants: NR
Adult asthma or COPD patients: 544
Education covered general management of asthma (and COPD), specifically including self-management support
Control: Standard care
Implementation outcome: Compared to control, at 1 yr there was no difference in change in proportion:
• Patients receiving written education I: +3% C: +7% Diff −1% (−13 to 11%) p = 0.8
Health outcome: Compared to control, at 1 yr there was no difference in:
• patients reporting exacerbations past 3 months (ratio) I: 0 C: −0.11 p = 0.1
Toelle et al.31
1993
Australia
2-group CCT
High RoB
9 months
Primary schools in 2 areas = ‘clusters’
HCPs: NR
Children/families: 132 (72 I, 60 C)
Evening workshops and in-service education on effective communication, self-management education for patient/families, and use of action plans
Control: Standard care
Implementation outcome: NR
Health outcome: Compared to control, at 6 m there was no difference in:
• Unscheduled doctor/ ED visits, mean (95% CI) I: 1.51 (0.94 to 2.08) C: 1.67 (1.01 to 2.33) p = NS
• Symptoms limiting activity, % (95% CI) I: 18.60% (7.0% to 30.2%) C: 8.30% (0% to 17.3%) p = NS
Tomson et al.32
1997
Sweden
2-group CCT
High RoB
18 months
2 localities = ’clusters’
30 PCPs (21 I, 9 C)
GPs: NR
Patients: 331 (249 I, 82 C)
Academic detailing for diagnosis and treatment of asthma, covering general management of asthma, specifically including self-management support
Control: Standard care
Implementation outcome: Compared to control, at 1 yr there was no difference in proportion:
• Given a PEF-based self-management plan I: 46% C: 32% p = 0.05
Health outcome: Compared to control, at 1 yr there was no difference in ratios of prescribed inhaled β-agonists to inhaled glucocorticoids
measured as defined daily doses: p = NS for areas/’clusters’
Volovitz et al.33
2003
Israel
4-group CCT
High RoB
9 months
PCPs in two regions within a HMO
GPs & paediatricians: NR
Adults & children: NR
Education covered general management of asthma, specifically including self-management support
I1: Asthma education programme; application of learning to future consultations monitored
I2: I1 except follow-up not monitored
Control 1: Standard care, patients in same region
Control 2: Standard care, patients in different region
Implementation outcome: data NR in full so not extracted
Health outcome: Compared to control, at 9 m patient reported:
Improvement in shortness of breath I1: 64% I2: 39% p>0.005 (significant)

ACQ, Asthma control questionnaire, AQ20, Airways Questionnaire 20, AQLQ, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, CCT, controlled clinical trial; C, control group, CME, continuing medical education; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ED, emergency department, GP, general practitioner, HMO, health maintenance organization, I, intervention group, NR, not reported, PACE, Physician Asthma Care Education, PCP, primary care physician, PEF, peak expiratory flow, QoL, quality of life, RCT, randomised controlled trial, RoB, risk of bias