Table 2.
Adjusted Models | Adjusted Models With Resampling |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimate | Standard Error |
p- value |
Estimate | Standard Error |
p- value |
|
Depressive Symptoms (n = 178) | ||||||
Intercept | -.01 | .07 | .99 | .37 | .14 | .01 |
Positive Affect Mean | -.35 | .07 | <.001 | -.42 | .07 | <.001 |
Positive Affect Variability | .10 | .08 | .20 | .06 | .08 | .41 |
Positive Affect Mean × Variability interaction |
.20 | .09 | .02 | .17 | .09 | .05 |
Anxiety (n = 171) | ||||||
Intercept | -.02 | .06 | .80 | .27 | .14 | .05 |
Positive Affect Mean | -.40 | .08 | <.001 | -.44 | .07 | <.001 |
Positive Affect Variability | .21 | .08 | .01 | .18 | .08 | .03 |
Positive Affect Mean × Variability interaction |
.11 | .09 | .23 | .09 | .09 | .31 |
Frequency of Alcohol Consumption (n = 177) | ||||||
Intercept | -.35 | .20 | .08 | -.19 | .14 | .19 |
Positive Affect Mean | .06 | .08 | .4 | -.03 | .07 | .68 |
Positive Affect Variability | .07 | .08 | .38 | .01 | .08 | .87 |
Positive Affect Mean × Variability interaction |
.22 | .09 | .02 | .18 | .09 | .06 |
Binge Drinking (n=184) | ||||||
Intercept | -1.58 | .84 | .06 | -1.56 | .59 | .01 |
Positive Affect Mean | -.12 | .36 | .73 | -.36 | .34 | .30 |
Positive Affect Variability | .34 | .38 | .37 | .20 | .40 | .60 |
Positive Affect Mean × Variability interaction |
.51 | .32 | .12 | .40 | .35 | .24 |
Note. Estimates for depressive symptoms, anxiety, and frequency of alcohol consumption in the past 30 days were standardized (M=0, SD=1) and served as the outcome variable in separate linear regressions. Binge drinking in the past 30 days and was the outcome variable in a logistic regression. Models control for income quartiles, household type (single-parent vs dual-parent/multigenerational) and education (college vs no college).