Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 19;17(11):3780–3790. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00455

Table 3. Pathway Analysis Using Metaboanalyst and with Reference to the KEGG Database Predicted the Most Enriched Pathways from the List of Metabolites That Were Significantly Different between OA and RA SF (FDR ≤ 0.1)a.

pathway total hits –log(p) FDR
Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis 75 12 24.693 1.51 × 10–9
Nitrogen metabolism 39 6 12.124 2.17 × 10–4
Valine, leucine and isoleucine biosynthesis 27 5 11.165 3.78 × 10–4
Taurine and hypotaurine metabolism 20 4 9.3989 1.66 × 10–3
Alanine, aspartate and glutamate metabolism 24 4 8.6483 2.81 × 10–3
Glycine, serine and threonine metabolism 48 5 8.2939 3.24 × 10–3
Arginine and proline metabolism 77 6 8.1678 3.24 × 10–3
Galactose metabolism 41 4 6.5415 1.44 × 10–2
Glycolysis or Gluconeogenesis 31 3 5.0818 5.52 × 10–2
Valine, leucine and isoleucine degradation 40 3 4.3697 1.02 × 10–1
a

Pathway enrichment was determined by Hypergeometric test and reported with an FDR-adjusted p-value. The number of metabolites enriched in our dataset (hits) is shown compared with the total number of metabolites in the KEGG pathway.