Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 6;19:406. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2432-7

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

The comparison of contigs generated by Bowtie2 and EIM on the regions of Chr1. Firstly, Chr1 was divided to some regions, pi1≤i≤25. Secondly, Bowtie2 and EIM were run by the read set of Chr1 and each pi1≤i≤25andi≠14, separately. Finally, the quality and contiguity of contigs were computed as a N50 size b The Remapped-Reads value c The number of IUPAC codes d The number of errors