Table 6.
No. of the at-risk area (full name of the area) | P1 (2012–2013 and 2013–2014) Culture | P2 (2015–2016 and 2016–2017) PCR |
---|---|---|
Apparent prevalence rates [95% CI] (No. of infected wild boar/no. analyzed) | ||
1 (Brotonne-Mauny forest) | 1.5% [0.6–3.2%] (6/401) | 1.3% [0.4–2.9%] (5/394) |
2 (Côte-d'Or) | 3.1% [1.7–5.1%] (15/483) | 2.2% [1.0–4.2%] (9/404) |
3 (Dordogne/Charente/Charente-Maritime/Haute-Vienne/Corrèze/Gironde) | 4.1% [2.4–6.4%] (17/419) | 2.7% [1.7–4.1%] (21/770) |
4 (Dordogne/Lot) | 4.3% [1.9–8.2%] (8/188) | 3.2% [1.6–5.7%] (11/341) |
5 (Béarn) | 2.1% [0.9–4.2%] (8/373) | 4.4% [2.4–7.4%] (13/295) |
9 (Lot-et-Garonne) | / | 4.2% [1.6–8.9%] (6/143) |
11 (Ariège/Haute-Garonne) | / | 0.5% [0–2.9%] (1/189) |
/: Targeted surveillance on badgers not required in the area.