Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 30;5:262. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00262

Table 6.

Apparent prevalence rates in wild boars in at-risk areas of France where infection has been found in wild boars in the 2012-2013-2014 period and the 2015-2016-2017 period [percentages are given with 95% confidence intervals (CI); in brackets number of infected/analyzed animals].

No. of the at-risk area (full name of the area) P1 (2012–2013 and 2013–2014) Culture P2 (2015–2016 and 2016–2017) PCR
Apparent prevalence rates [95% CI] (No. of infected wild boar/no. analyzed)
1 (Brotonne-Mauny forest) 1.5% [0.6–3.2%] (6/401) 1.3% [0.4–2.9%] (5/394)
2 (Côte-d'Or) 3.1% [1.7–5.1%] (15/483) 2.2% [1.0–4.2%] (9/404)
3 (Dordogne/Charente/Charente-Maritime/Haute-Vienne/Corrèze/Gironde) 4.1% [2.4–6.4%] (17/419) 2.7% [1.7–4.1%] (21/770)
4 (Dordogne/Lot) 4.3% [1.9–8.2%] (8/188) 3.2% [1.6–5.7%] (11/341)
5 (Béarn) 2.1% [0.9–4.2%] (8/373) 4.4% [2.4–7.4%] (13/295)
9 (Lot-et-Garonne) / 4.2% [1.6–8.9%] (6/143)
11 (Ariège/Haute-Garonne) / 0.5% [0–2.9%] (1/189)

/: Targeted surveillance on badgers not required in the area.