Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 31;5(5):ENEURO.0313-18.2018. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0313-18.2018

Table 4.

OTUs that is significant different between the PolyIC and PBS groups

OTU p FDR_P PolyIC PBS
All samples k__Bacteria;p__Proteobacteria;c__Gammaproteobacteria;o__Pasteurellales;f__Pasteurellaceae;g__Actinobacillus 0.00005 0.00624 0.46% 0.00%
Female only k__Bacteria;p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia 0.0472 0.44131 61.24% 82.02%
k__Bacteria;p__Proteobacteria;c__Gammaproteobacteria;o__Pasteurellales;f__Pasteurellaceae 0.00902 0.21656 31.57% 6.92%
k__Bacteria;p__Proteobacteria;c__Gammaproteobacteria;o__Enterobacteriales;f__Enterobacteriaceae 0.01629 0.26788 1.01% 9.41%
k__Bacteria;p__Proteobacteria;c__Gammaproteobacteria;o__Pasteurellales;f__Pasteurellaceae;g__Actinobacillus 0.00535 0.14953 0.73% 0.00%