Table 4.
Path analysis showing direct and indirect effect of different traits on seed yield in M2 generation of Kabuli chickpea.
| Trait | Indirect effect to SY |
Total effects |
Total correlation to SY | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DF | DM | HP | HFP | NPB | NSP | TPP | TNS | HSW | Direct | Indirect | ||
| DF | 0.000 | -0.008 | -0.001 | 0.005 | 0.008 | 0.042 | -0.385 | -0.012 | -0.01 | -0.35 | -0.36 | |
| DM | -0.0035 | -0.002 | -0.004 | 0.000 | 0.022 | 0.044 | -0,449 | -0.005 | 0.00 | -0.40 | -0.40 | |
| HP | 0.0027 | 0.000 | -0.002 | -0.006 | -0.017 | -0.057 | 0.599 | 0.032 | 0.03 | 0.55 | 0.59 | |
| HFP | -0.0013 | 0.000 | 0.007 | -0.002 | 0.015 | 0.033 | 0.332 | -0.005 | -0.01 | 0.38 | 0.37 | |
| NPB | 0.0023 | 0.000 | 0.009 | -0.001 | 0.017 | -0.025 | 0.182 | -0.005 | -0.02 | 0.18 | 0.16 | |
| NSP | 0.0007 | 0.000 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.003 | -0.029 | 0.439 | 0.051 | -0.11 | 0.47 | 0.37 | |
| TPP | 0.0038 | 0.000 | 0.016 | 0.003 | -0.005 | -0.029 | 1.038 | 0.016 | -0.11 | 1.04 | 0.93 | |
| TNS | 0.0036 | 0.000 | 0.015 | -0.003 | -0.003 | -0.045 | -0.107 | 0.007 | 1.07 | -0.13 | 0.94 | |
| HSW | 0.0005 | 0.000 | 0.004 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -0.024 | -0.008 | 0.032 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 0.24 | |