Table 3. Effects of electromagnetic pulse on the epididymal sperm characteristics (n = 8, mean ± SEM).
| Group | Sperm concentration (× 106 ml–1) | Deformity rate (%) | Halo formation rate (%) |
| Sham | 39.5 ± 10.75 | 1.8 ± 0.87 | 35.83 ± 5.35 |
| 100 pulses | 21.5 ± 9.18* | 2.87 ± 0.81 | 15.33 ± 2.02* |
| 400 pulses | 16.33 ± 3.08* | 2.6 ± 0.53 | 19.5 ± 2.55* |