Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 12;7(6):1120–1127. doi: 10.1039/c8tx00096d

Table 3. Effects of electromagnetic pulse on the epididymal sperm characteristics (n = 8, mean ± SEM).

Group Sperm concentration (× 106 ml–1) Deformity rate (%) Halo formation rate (%)
Sham 39.5 ± 10.75 1.8 ± 0.87 35.83 ± 5.35
100 pulses 21.5 ± 9.18* 2.87 ± 0.81 15.33 ± 2.02*
400 pulses 16.33 ± 3.08* 2.6 ± 0.53 19.5 ± 2.55*