Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 3;19(9):2895–2914. doi: 10.1029/2017GC007385

Table 3.

Published Values of ETH Standards Projected to 25 °C, and Number in Parenthesis Is the Number of Replicates

Standard This study: MAT 253, 70°C Kiel IV device Porapak without He flow. AFF: 0.062. Daëron et al. (2016), Isoprime 100 common acid bath, 90°, Porapak trap with He flow. AFF 0.082 Schauer et al. (2016), MAT 253, 90° common acid bath, AFF: 0.082 Breitenbach et al. (2018), MAT 253, 70 °C Kiel IV device Porapak without He flow. AFF: 0.062.
ETH‐1 0.258 ± 0.003 (82) 0.311 ± 0.006 (18) 0.286 ± 0.006 (8) 0.265 ± 0.002 (279)
ETH‐2 0.256 ± 0.004 (83) 0.306 ± 0.007 (13) 0.282 ± 0.005 (12) 0.253 ± 0.002 (292)
ETH‐3 0.691 ± 0.004 (73) 0.695 ± 0.009 (6) 0.693 ± 0.002 (267)
ETH‐4 0.507 ± 0.004 (83) 0.537 ± 0.006 (7) 0.503 ± 0.003 (324)

Note. The different fractionation factors are due to the fact that Daëron et al. (2016) and Schauer et al. (2016) used a reaction temperature of 90°C, whereas Breitenbach et al. (2018) and this study reacted the carbonates at 70°C. AFF = acid fractionation factor used to project the results to 25°C.