Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 27;20(5):729–737. doi: 10.1111/cid.12628

Table 2.

Results from linear/volumetric measurements on computed tomography and 3D‐scanned data of study casts

Horizontal width reduction (mm) DBBM group (n = 47) DPBM group (n = 47)
Apical Middle Coronal Apical Middle Coronal
Middle 1.21 ± 2.69 1.59 ± 2.34 2.81 ± 4.47 0.84 ± 2.08 1.43 ± 1.77 2.50 ± 4.73
Distal 0.74 ± 1.32 1.08 ± 1.86 2.33 ± 3.35 0.60 ± 1.34 1.47 ± 1.85 2.24 ± 3.52
Mesial 0.66 ± 1.51 1.01 ± 1.32 2.47 ± 3.05 0.59 ± 1.34 1.1 ± 1.68 1.97 ± 3.95
Average 0.73 ± 1.40 1.22 ± 1.89 2.67 ± 3.42 0.62 ± 1.66 1.16 ± 2.15 2.09 ± 4.19
Vertical height reduction (mm) 1.45 ± 1.92 1.22 ± 2.16
Volume reduction (%) 8.14 ± 22.23 6.48 ± 24.23
Papilla height reduction (mm) Mesial 0.82 ± 1.22 0.87 ± 1.21
Distal 0.15 ± 1.60 0.23 ± 1.65
Soft tissue dimension (mm) Horizontal reduction 4.74 ± 3.14 4.04 ± 2.92
Vertical reduction Buccal 3.00 ± 2.06 2.63 ± 1.90
Lingual 2.08 ± 2.23 2.17 ± 1.67

A, apical; M, middle; C, coronal. There was no significant difference in all parameters between control and test groups.