Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 13;24(51):13681–13687. doi: 10.1002/chem.201803143

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Bioactive space coverage of the DOS library, compared to two targeted compound libraries and seven different bioactivity classes of common protein targets obtained from ChEMBL (based on Morgan fingerprints and Multi‐Dimensional Scaling, MDS; ellipses cover 90 % of the data in each class. It can be seen that the DOS library displays significantly wider coverage in bioactivity space than the two targeted libraries, covering all common classes of drug targets used for comparison.