Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 22;18(1):81–89. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2017.10.001

Table 2.

Reliability and concurrent validity of Sizing Them Up (Taiwan version).

Domain
alpha/omega
Test-Retesta
Floor
Ceiling
Concurrent Validity
(N° of items) (N = 236) (N = 82) (%) (%) Sizing Me Upb
KINDLc
PedsQLc
(N = 231) (N = 233) (N = 213)
Emotion (7) .66/.81 .74 0.0 36.4 .40** .27** .32**
Physical (5) .61/.71 .63 0.0 68.2 .38** .33** .28**
Teasing/Marginalization (3) .72/.84 .71 0.0 78.0 .40** .34** .30**
Positive Attributes (4) .60/.79 .65 0.4 3.4 .24** .49** .32**
Mealtime (2) .56/--d .67 0.0 38.6 .20* .28** .31**
School (1) --/--d  − .01 0.0 97.9 .28** .23* .20*
Total Score (22) .77/.89 .75 0.0 0.4 .47** .53** .46**
*

p < .05

**

p < .001. Alpha = Cronbach's alpha; Omega = McDonald's omega.

a

Pearson correlation was used for test-retest reliability.

b

reported by children.

c

reported by parents.

d

Insufficient item number to calculate alpha or omega.