Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 13;104(5):966–973. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1023

Table 2.

Noncompartmental analysis derived pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax AUC0‐t, AUC0‐inf, Tmax and T1/2 from observed concentrations and individual Bayesian posterior final model predicted time‐observation profiles, per treatment

Formulation 1 Formulation 2 Formulation 3 Formulation 4
Cmax (mg/l) observed 5.33 ± 1.79 5.43 ± 1.86 5.48 ± 1.44 5.62 ± 1.65
Cmax (mg/l) predicted 4.99 ± 1.71 4.87 ± 1.65 5.11 ± 1.36 5.16 ± 1.52
AUC0‐t (h.mg/l) observed 63.42 ± 25.72 61.55 ± 24.70 61.16 ± 20.80 62.08 ± 22.91
AUC0‐t (h.mg/l) predicted 59.92 ± 24.71 58.87 ± 24.01 58.88 ± 19.83 57.92 ± 22.04
AUC0‐inf (h.mg/l) observed 64.49 ± 25.68 62.39 ± 24.68 62.45 ± 20.88 63.03 ± 23.13
AUC0‐inf (h.mg/l) predicted 60.18 ± 24.62 59.12 ± 23.92 59.02 ± 19.87 58.29 ± 22.01
Tmax (h) observed 4.0 (2.50‐8.0) 4.25 (2.0‐8.0) 3.50 (1.5‐6.0) 3.75 (1.5‐8.0)
Tmax (h) predicted 3.5 (1.8‐8.8) 3.7 (2.2‐6.4) 3.0 (1.6‐6.2) 3.7 (1.6‐6.0)
T1/2 (h) observed 8.12 ± 2.70 8.08 ± 2.08 9.08 ± 3.63 7.66 ± 2.63
T1/2 (h) predicted 7.66 ± 5.94 7.92 ± 6.85 7.53 ± 4.25 12.24 ± 18.81

All parameters are mean ± SD, but Tmax median and range.