Table 5.
Mean urinary, bowel and sexual function scores (EPIC‐26) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Urinary incontinence (n = 1949) | Urinary irritation/obstructive (n = 1847) | Bowel function (n = 2089) | Sexual function (n = 2323) | |||||
Unadjusted mean | Adjusted mean ratio | Unadjusted mean | Adjusted mean ratio | Unadjusted mean | Adjusted mean ratio | Unadjusted mean | Adjusted mean ratio | |
Total | 89.0 | – | 88.5 | – | 93.6 | – | 50.0 | – |
Self‐assessed health rating (EQ‐VAS) | P < 0.001* | P < 0.001* | P < 0.001* | P < 0.001* | P < 0.001* | P < 0.001* | P < 0.001* | P < 0.001* |
≥90 (better health) | 94.5 | 1.00 | 93.2 | 1.00 | 97.4 | 1.00 | 62.2 | 1.00 |
80–89.9 | 90.7 | 0.97 | 89.2 | 0.95 | 94.3 | 0.98 | 52.7 | 0.90 |
70–79.9 | 88.4 | 0.95 | 86.6 | 0.93 | 93.2 | 0.98 | 44.4 | 0.88 |
<70 (poorer health) | 77.8 | 0.88 | 80.2 | 0.86 | 86.3 | 0.94 | 29.7 | 0.66 |
Data are weighted to the NI population by age and deprivation. The adjusted mean score ratio was determined using a log‐linear regression model with significant variables from Table 3 used as covariates. A value <1 can be interpreted as poorer functioning compared to the baseline category, whilst a value >1 can be interpreted as better functioning compared to the baseline category. *Significant at P < 0.05 after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (correction applies to unadjusted results only).