Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 23;27(10):1101–1111. doi: 10.1002/pds.4436

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Variance of the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) estimates when corrected for both within‐physician and within‐patient clustering versus within‐patient clustering only. The figure shows the width of the 95% CIs around the sensitivity (panel A) and PPV estimates (panel B) when a 2‐stage cluster bootstrap28 was used to correct for clustering of prescriptions within patients who in turn were nested within physicians (capped vertical bars) versus when a 1‐stage cluster bootstrap was used to correct for only clustering of prescriptions within patients (uncapped vertical bars). The upper and lower bounds of the 95% CI correspond to the values of the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of the distribution of the respective estimates across 1000 bootstrap re‐samples. Results are shown for the 7 most common treatment indications based on diagnostic codes recorded in administrative data within ±3 days of the prescription date