Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 30;18(11):2739–2751. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14989

Table 6.

Transplant outcomes in a 1‐1 case‐control propensity score matched analysis of recipients of kidneys from donors who died following ligature asphyxiation and their matched controls. Propensity scores were estimated using the following donor and recipient variables: donor age, recipient age, donor past medical history of hypertension, primary renal disease, HLA mismatch grade, cold ischaemic time, donor weight, donor type (DBD and DCD), and transplant year

Recipients of kidneys from donors dying after ligature asphyxiation (n = 622) median propensity score, 0.059 (0.031‐0.108) Matched control recipients (n = 622) median propensity score, 0.060 (0.030‐ 0.105) Propensity score matched ligature asphyxiation vs. nonligature asphyxiation P value
Primary‐nonfunction 9/570 (1.6%) 11 /580 (1.9%) OR 1.083 (0.456‐2.569) .897
Delayed graft function 152/570 (26.7%) 132/580 (22.8%) OR 0.810 (0.619‐1.060) .687
1‐y death censored graft survival 96.1% 96.3% HR 1.051 (0.593‐1.862) .865
5‐y death censored graft survival 91.3% 89.2% HR 0.805 (0.537‐1.208) .295
1‐y patient survival from transplantation 97.5% 97.8% HR 0.664 (0.347‐1.273) .218
5‐y patient survival from transplantation 90.7% 92.5% HR 0.985 (0.640‐1.515) .945
1‐y first kidney, death censored graft survival (n = 1077) 96.6% 96.8% HR 1.06 (0.544‐2.046) .875
5‐y first kidney, death censored graft survival (n = 1077) 92.9% 90.9% HR 0.800 (0.499‐1.282) .353
12‐mo eGFR (n = 1104) 61 (47‐74) (n = 535) 59 (47‐74) (n = 557) PE 1.575 (−3.392‐2.788) .848

HR, hazard ratio; OR, odds ratio; PE, parameter estimate.