Table 3.
Spearman correlations between DMFS subscales and GOSE | Mean scores on the DMFS subscales M (SD) | Good outcome versus poor outcome | Complete versus incomplete RTW | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOSE SAH | GOSE aSAH | GOSE anSAH | GOSE good outcome (7–8) N = 114 | GOSE poor outcome (3–6) N = 85 | Complete RTW N = 56 | Incomplete RTW N = 74 | t | P | d | t | P | d | |
Mental‐f | −0.52* | −0.53* | −0.42* | 18.6 (6.4) | 25.4 (6.4) | 17.8 (5.4) | 24.8 (6 .9) | −7.41 | <0.001* | 1.06 | −6.36 | <0.001* | 1.13 |
Physical‐f | −0.43* | −0.42* | −0.49* | 14.4 (5.1) | 19.0 (5.7) | 13.6 (4.8) | 18.3 (5.4) | −5.89 | <0.001* | 0.86 | −5.13 | <0.001* | 0.94 |
anSAH, angiographically negative subarachnoid hemorrhage; aSAH, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage; DMFS, Dutch Multifactor Fatigue Scale; GOSE, Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended; Mental‐f, DMFS Mental fatigue; Physical‐f, DMFS Physical fatigue; RTW, return to work; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage. *Significant differences (P < 0.05).