Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 25;25(11):1313–e113. doi: 10.1111/ene.13723

Table 3.

Associations between DMFS subscales, GOSE and RTW

Spearman correlations between DMFS subscales and GOSE Mean scores on the DMFS subscales M (SD) Good outcome versus poor outcome Complete versus incomplete RTW
GOSE SAH GOSE aSAH GOSE anSAH GOSE good outcome (7–8) N = 114 GOSE poor outcome (3–6) N = 85 Complete RTW N = 56 Incomplete RTW N = 74 t P d t P d
Mental‐f −0.52* −0.53* −0.42* 18.6 (6.4) 25.4 (6.4) 17.8 (5.4) 24.8 (6 .9) −7.41 <0.001* 1.06 −6.36 <0.001* 1.13
Physical‐f −0.43* −0.42* −0.49* 14.4 (5.1) 19.0 (5.7) 13.6 (4.8) 18.3 (5.4) −5.89 <0.001* 0.86 −5.13 <0.001* 0.94

anSAH, angiographically negative subarachnoid hemorrhage; aSAH, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage; DMFS, Dutch Multifactor Fatigue Scale; GOSE, Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended; Mental‐f, DMFS Mental fatigue; Physical‐f, DMFS Physical fatigue; RTW, return to work; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage. *Significant differences (P < 0.05).