Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 8;115(10):2479–2488. doi: 10.1002/bit.26800

Table 2.

Fed‐batch cultivation of PGTH1 and PGTH1 variants expressing eGFP

Batch end Fed batch end
Clone t a (h) YDM b (g/L) Relative eGFP fluorescence % c t a (h) YDM b (g/L) Relative eGFP fluorescence % c
PGTH1 #8 −5.3 9.8 44 ± 1 100 19.5 118.6 2005 ± 36 100
PGTH1 ‐∆2 #3 −4.6 11.0 51 ± 1 116 19.5 110.6 1819 ± 43 91
PGTH1 ‐T16 #3 −3.0 14.2 70 ± 1 160 19.5 113.1 2383 ± 24 119
PGTH1 ‐D1240 #3 −3.0 14.9 62 ± 1 141 19.5 113.3 2948 ± 33 147
a

Fed batch start t = 0.

b

Yeast dry mass.

c

GFP signal relative to clone PGTH1 #8.