Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 28;26(8):1365–1371. doi: 10.1002/oby.22224

Table 2.

Indirect effect of perceived overweight on stress‐induced overeating via weight stigma concerns (Study 1)

Unstandardized coefficient SE P Bootstrap 95% CI Model R 2/proportion mediated (%) Standardized coefficienta SE 95% CI
Model 1 b Path A 3.28 0.55 <0.001 2.19 to 4.36 0.50 0.08 0.33 to 0.67
Path B 0.04 0.01 <0.001 0.03 to 0.05 0.29 0.04 0.20 to 0.38
Indirect effect 0.13 0.03 0.08 to 0.20 31.8% 0.14 0.03 0.09 to 0.22
Path C (total effect) 0.41 0.08 <0.001 0.25 to 0.57 0.166 0.45 0.09 0.27 to 0.64
Path C' (direct effect) 0.28 0.08 <0.001 0.12 to 0.44 0.223 0.31 0.09 0.12 to 0.49
Model 2 c Path A 2.66 0.51 <0.001 1.65 to 3.67 0.41 0.08 0.25 to 0.56
Path B 0.03 0.01 <0.001 0.01 to 0.04 0.21 0.05 0.11 to 0.30
Indirect effect 0.08 0.02 0.04 to 0.13 23.3% 0.08 0.03 0.04 to 0.14
Path C (total effect) 0.33 0.08 <0.001 0.17 to 0.48 0.234 0.36 0.09 0.18 to 0.54
Path C' (direct effect) 0.25 0.08 0.002 0.09 to 0.41 0.258 0.28 0.09 0.10 to 0.46

Indirect effect = effect of perceived overweight on stress‐induced overeating through weight stigma concerns; Path A = correlation between perceived overweight and weight stigma concerns; Path B = correlation between weight stigma concerns and stress‐induced overeating; Path C = effect of perceived overweight on stress‐induced overeating when weight stigma concerns are not present in the model; Path C' = correlation between perceived overweight and stress‐induced overeating after taking weight stigma concerns into account.

a

Calculated by repeating analysis of indirect effects on z scores for all continuous variables (age, BMI, neuroticism, perceived weight discrimination, and depression).

b

Adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity (white, nonwhite), income, education, chronic illness, and BMI.

c

Adjusted for variables listed for Model 1 plus neuroticism, perceived weight discrimination, and depression.