Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 17;99(5):1180–1185. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0372

Table 4.

Backward logistic regression analysis of factors associated with Fasciola hepatica exposure

Characteristic Odds ratio 95% Confidence interval P value
District Ancahuasi Reference
Anta 2.34 0.99–5.51 0.051
Zurite 2.43 1.03–5.74 0.043
Age (years) 1.05 1.01–1.10 0.014
> 34.4% Probability of living in poverty* 1.63 1.14–2.31 0.006

Independent variables entered in the model: district, age, gender, history of treatment of malnutrition, years of education for the father, years of education for the mother, > 34.4% probability of living in poverty, construction material of the home, stunting, anemia, elevation of the house, and drinking water from irrigation channel. Wald = 68.29 P < 0.001. Hosmer and Lemeshow test: χ2 = 10.4, df: 8, P = 0.23.

*

According to the simple poverty scorecard probabilities of living with less than US$3.25 a day.