Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 7;13(11):e0206151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206151

Table 3. Raw scores on D-KEFS tests for metacognition and executive functions (mean (SD)) of Dutch elite and sub-elite table tennis players (n = 60).

Elite players (n = 30) Sub-elite players (n = 30) F-value /
p-value
Effect size d
Design Fluency Test for metacognition (working memory, inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility)
DFT-1 13.3 (3.2) 12.4 (3.0) 1.355 / .249 0.29
DFT-2 15.4 (3.3) 14.1 (3.0) 2.585 / .113 0.41
DFT-3 10.2 (2.6) 9.9 (2.3) .268 / .606 0.12
DFT-total 40.9 (6.1) 39.0 (6.0) 1.459 / .232 0.31
Colour Word Interference Test for inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility
CWI-3 Time (s) 47.9 (9.3) 49.6 (11.1) .397 / .531 0.17
CWI-3 Number of mistakes 0.9 (0.9)* 1.8 (1.1)* 12.257 / .001 0.90
CWI-4 Time (s) 52.4 (9.2) 57.5 (12.0) 3.405 / .070 0.48
CWI-4 Number of mistakes 1.1 (1.2)* 2.6 (1.5)* 18.392 / < .001 1.10
Trail Making Test for cognitive flexibility
TMT-4 Time (s) 60.2 (17.3) 61.7 (36.1) .042 / .838 0.05
TMT-4 Number of mistakes 0.7 (1.0) 0.4 (0.6) 1.485 / .228 0.36

*Significant difference between elite and sub-elite table tennis players (p < 0.05)

d around 0.20 is small; d around 0.50 is medium; d around 0.80 is large (Cohen, 1988).