Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 11;36(12):2453–2459. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001840

TABLE 1.

Treatment matrix and procedural details

Number of ablations Ratio of numbers of ablations (branch/main)
Group Animal ID Left Right Left Right Mean ± SD
Branch Main Total Branch Main Total Total/animal Mean ± SD
Group SPY SP1 14 5 19 11 9 20 39 33.2 ± 3.3 2.8 1.2 1.4 ± 0.7
SP2 7 6 13 8 10 18 31 1.2 0.8
SP3 8 4 12 10 9 19 31 2.0 1.1
SP4 10 5 15 8 9 17 32 2.0 0.9
SP5 8 9 17 6 10 16 33 0.9 0.6
Group IBB IB1 7 6 13 7 10 17 30 26.2 ± 3.3 1.2 0.7 0.9 ± 0.5
IB2 8 6 14 5 8 13 27 1.3 0.6
IB3 5 4 9 6 6 12 21 1.3 1.0
IB4 2 10 12 4 11 15 27 0.2 0.4
IB5 8 5 13 4 9 13 26 1.6 0.4
Sham group Sham1
Sham2 No ablations performed
Sham3

Top: five animals were treated with the Symplicity Spyral system (group SPY). All animals of this group received 33.2 ± 3.3 ablations in main and branch arteries. The ratio of number of ablations (branch/main) was 1.4 ± 0.7. Middle: five animals were treated with the IberisBloom system (group IBB). All animals of this group received 26.2 ± 3.3 ablations in main and branch arteries. The ratio of number of ablations (branch/main) was 0.9 ± 0.5. Bottom: three animals received sham procedure (Sham Group) with zero ablations. IBB, IberisBloom; SPY, Symplicity Spyral.