Table 6.
HQ and LTCR | Formaldehyde | Acetaldehyde | Location | Outdoor or indoor | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HQ(a) | Mean | 1.53 | − | Shiraz, Iran | Outdoor (in the ambient air) | This study (summer) |
SD | 0.83 | − | ||||
HQ(a) | Mean | 0.87 | − | Shiraz, Iran | Outdoor (in the ambient air) | This study (winter) |
SD | 0.50 | − | ||||
HQ(b) | Mean | 0.07 | − | Shiraz, Iran | Outdoor (in the ambient air) | This study (summer) |
SD | 0.04 | − | ||||
HQ(b) | Mean | 0.04 | − | Shiraz, Iran | Outdoor (in the ambient air) | This study (winter) |
SD | 0.02 | − | ||||
HQ(c) | Mean | 4.18 | − | Shiraz, Iran | Outdoor (in the ambient air) | This study (summer) |
SD | 2.54 | − | ||||
HQ(c) | Mean | 2.38 | − | Shiraz, Iran | Outdoor (in the ambient air) | This study (winter) |
SD | 1.64 | − | ||||
HQ(d) | Mean | − | 0.97 | Shiraz, Iran | Outdoor (in the ambient air) | This study (summer) |
SD | − | 0.57 | ||||
HQ(d) | Mean | − | 0.42 | Shiraz, Iran | Outdoor (in the ambient air) | This study (winter) |
SD | − | 0.20 | ||||
LTCR(e) | − | − | 9.25 × 10−5 − 9.69 × 10−6 | Shiraz, Iran | Outdoor (in the ambient air) | This study (summer) |
LTCR(e) | − | 2.18 × 10−5 − 7.55 × 10−6 | Shiraz, Iran | Outdoor (in the ambient air) | This study (winter) | |
LTCR(f) | 5.83 × 10−5 − 9.71 × 10−6 | − | Shiraz, Iran | Outdoor (in the ambient air) | This study (summer) | |
LTCR(f) | 3.12 × 10−5 − 7.81 × 10−6 | Shiraz, Iran | Outdoor (in the ambient air) | This study (winter) | ||
LTCR(g) | − | 1.37 × 10−4 − 6.80 × 10−5 | Shiraz, Iran | Outdoor (in the ambient air) | This study (summer) | |
LTCR(g) | − | 2.87 × 10−5 − 4.82 × 10−6 | Shiraz, Iran | Outdoor (in the ambient air) | This study (winter) | |
LTCR(h) | 4.63 × 10−5 − 2.58 × 10−4 | − | Shiraz, Iran | Outdoor (in the ambient air) | This study (summer) | |
LTCR(h) | 1.46 × 10−4 − 2.52 × 10−5 | − | Shiraz, Iran | Outdoor (in the ambient air) | This study (winter) | |
HQ | Mean | − | − | Guiyang, China | Indoor Environments | (Li et al., 2008) |
LTCR | 6.96 × 10−6 − 2.48 × 10−4 | − | ||||
HQ | Mean | − | − | Five cities (Harbin, Beijing, Shanghai, Changsha, and Shenzhen), China | Residential environment, Indoor | (Zheng et al., 2005) |
LTCR | 3.41 × 10−3 | − | ||||
HQ | Mean | − | − | Taipei, Taiwan | Office buildings, Indoor | (Wu et al., 2003) |
LTCR | 2.06 × 10−4 − 1.75 × 10−3 | − | ||||
HQ | Mean | Greek, Greece | Policemen- Outdoor | (Pilidis et al., 2009) | ||
LTCR | 2.01 × 10−4 | |||||
HQ | Mean | Greek, Greece | Laboratory technicians,Indoor | (Pilidis et al., 2009) | ||
LTCR | 2.67 × 10−4 | |||||
HQ | Mean | 0.31 | 0.09 | Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, | Office, Indoor | (Tunsaringkarn et al., 2012c) |
LTCR | 2.22 × 10−5 | 2.89 × 10−6 | Thailand | |||
HQ | Mean | 0.16 | 0.05 | Pathumwan district, Bangkok, Thailand | Gasoline Station workers, Outdoor | (Tunsaringkarn et al., 2012c) |
LTCR | 1.14 × 10−5 | 1.60 × 10−6 | ||||
HQ | Mean | 2.17 | − | Tarragona County, Catalonia, Spain. | Homes (terrace or balcony), | (Rovira et al., 2016) |
LTCR | 4.72 × 10−4 − 9.45 × 10−4 | − | Outdoor | |||
HQ | Mean | − | − | Bangkok, Thailand | Urban environments | (Kanjanasiranont et al., 2017) |
LTCR | 2.84 × 10−4 | 2.52 × 10−4 | ||||
HQ | Mean | − | − | Hangzhou, China | Bus stations (for staffs), Outdoor | (Weng et al., 2009) |
LTCR | 2.2 × 10−4 | 2.7 × 10−5 | ||||
HQ | Mean | − | − | Hangzhou, China | Bus stations (for costumers and | (Weng et al., 2009) |
LTCR | 2.2 × 10−4 | 2.7 × 10−5 | passengers), Outdoor | |||
HQ | Mean | − | − | Hangzhou, China | Railway stations (for staffs), Outdoor | (Weng et al., 2009) |
LTCR | 2.00 × 10−4 | 4.5 × 10−5 | ||||
HQ | Mean | − | − | Hangzhou, China | Railway stations (for costumers and | (Weng et al., 2009) |
LTCR | 2.00 × 10−4 | 4.5 × 10−5 | passengers), Outdoor | |||
HQ | Mean | − | − | Bangkok, Thailand | Petrol Station Workers, Outdoor | (Kitwattanavong et al. 2013) |
LTCR | 7.81 × 10−6 − 1.04 × 10−5 | 1.39 × 10−6 − 2.45 × 10−6 | ||||
HQ | Mean | 0.23 | 0.14 | Bangkok, Thailand | Petrol Station Workers, Outdoor | (Tunsaringkarn et al., 2012a) |
LTCR | 1.89 × 10−5 | 4.32 × 10−6 | ||||
HQ | Mean | 0.27 | 0.11 | Bangkok, Thailand | Roadside, Outdoor | (Tunsaringkarn et al., 2012a) |
LTCR | 1.97 × 10−5 | 3.63 × 10−6 | ||||
HQ | Mean | 0.40 | 0.19 | Bangkok, Thailand | Pathumwan district (gasoline station workers), Outdoor | (Tunsaringkarn et al., 2012b) |
LTCR | 1.27 × 10−5 | 2.69 × 10−6 | ||||
HQ | Mean | − | − | Fortaleza, Brazil | Hospital A, Indoor | (Sousa et al., 2011) |
LTCR | 1.36 × 10−5 | 1.78 × 10−5 | ||||
HQ | Mean | Fortaleza, Brazil | Hospital B, Indoor | (Sousa et al., 2011) | ||
LTCR | 3.57 × 10−5 | 3.35 × 10−6 | ||||
HQ | Mean | − | − | Californian, United State | Furniture, Indoor | (Mølhave et al., 1995) |
LTCR | 6.8 × 10−8 − 8.9 × 10−8 | − | ||||
HQ | Mean | − | − | Californian, United State | Furniture, Indoor | (Mølhave et al., 1995) |
LTCR | 5.8 × 10−7 − 7.4 × 10−7 | − |
HQ: hazard quotient; ILTCR: integrated lifetime cancer risk.
Rfc for formaldehyde (IRIS) = 9.83 × 10−3 mg m−3 (USEPA 2004).
Rfc for formaldehyde (EPA) = 2.00 × 10−1 mg m−3 (USEPA 1989).
Rfc for formaldehyde (CAPCOA, California EPA) = 3.6 × 10−3 mg m−3 (CalEPA 1997; Wu et al. 2003).
Rfc for acetaldehyde (EPA) = 9.00 × 10−3 mg m−3 (USEPA, 1999a, 1999b, 2004).
CSF = 7.70 × 10−3 (mg kg−1 day−1)−1 for acetaldehyde (IRIS) (Sousa et al., 2011; USEPA, 1996).
CSF = 4.55 × 10−2 (mg kg−1 day−1)−1 for formaldehyde (IRIS) (Sousa et al., 2011; USEPA, 1996).
CSF = 1.00 × 10−2 (mg kg−1 day−1)−1 for acetaldehyde (OEHHA) (OEHHA, 2009).
CSF = 2.10 × 10−2 (mg kg−1 day−1)−1 for formaldehyde (OEHHA) (OEHHA, 2009).