Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2018 Aug 31;28(1):33–43. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2018.07.003

Table 1.

Summary of Therapeutic TMS Studies for Adolescent Depression

References N Mean Age (yrs) Frequency Intensity Location Clinical Outcome
Walter et al. 2001 4 16 1–10 Hz (variable) 90–110% LDLPFC 2 responders (one non-responder had bipolar depression)
Loo et al. 2006 2 16 10 Hz 110% LDLPFC 2 responders
Bloch et al. 2008 9 17 10 Hz 80% LDLPFC 3 responders
1 partial responder
Wall et al. 2011 8 16 10 Hz 120% LDLPFC 6 responders
Mayer et al. 2012 (3 year follow-up from Bloch et al. 2008 study) 8 17 10 Hz 80% LDLPFC Improvement in depressive symptoms was durable at follow-up
Le et al. 2013 25 11 1 Hz 110% SMA Group level improvement in depressive symptoms
Yang et al. 2014 6 18 10 Hz 120% LDLPFC 4 responders
Wall et al. 2016 10 15 10 Hz 120% LDLPFC 6 responders
Farzan et al. 2017 16 21 iTBS and cTBS 80% LDLPFC (iTBS)
RDLPFC (cTBS)
4 responders
9 partial responders
MacMaster et al. 2018 32 17 10 Hz 120% LDLPFC 18 responders

cTBS: continuous theta burst, Hz: hertz, iTBS: intermittent theta burst, LDLPFC: Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex, RDLPFC: Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex, SMA: Supplementary Motor Area