Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 3;91(1087):20180129. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180129

Table 3.

ROC analysis results by sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and diagnostic accuracy and area under the ROC

Diagnostic performance Parameter Cut-off value Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) Diagnostic accuracy 
(95% CI)
AUC (95% CI) p
Differentiating lymphoma from normal LN SMI -VI >15% 91 99 96 94 95 (90–98) 97 (95–99) 0.001
Elastography parameters >17 kPa
>2.45 m sn–1
96
90
100
99
100
96
99
95
99 (96–99)
95 (46–63)
99 (99–100)
98 (95–100)
0.001
0.001
SI >65% 63 100 100 90 91 (86–95) 91 (85–97) 0.001
Differentiating lymphadenitis from normal LN SMI -VI >11% 85 84 85 85 85 (78–90) 85 (78–92) 0.001
Elastography parameters >2.24 m sn–1
>15 kPa
25
27
97
96
82
82
73
74
74 (66–80)
74 (66–80)
61 (51–71)
60 (41–61)
0.01
0.01
SI >55% 47 93 78 78 78 (71–84) 75 (65–85) 0.001
Differentiating lymphoma from lymphadenitis SMI -VI >15% 85 81 84 82 83 (79–85) 82 (80–85) 0.001
Elastography parameters >2.45 m sn–1
>17 kPa
96
96
82
81
77
76
98
97
88 (79–99)
87 (78–93)
91 (0–100)
91 (0–100)
0.001
0.001
SI >65% 63 70 56 76 68 (57–77) 72 (64–86) 0.002

AUC, area under the curve; LN, lymph node; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; SI, shape index; SMI, superb microvascular imaging; VI, vascularity index.